执行计划中常见index访问方式

近期有朋友对于单个表上的index各种情况比较模糊,这里对于单个表上,单个index出现的大多数情况进行了总结性测试,给出了测试结果,至于为什么出现这样的试验结果未做过多解释,给读者留下思考的空间.本篇文章仅仅是为了测试hint对index的影响,而不是说明走各种index方式的好坏.参考: INDEX FULL SCAN vs INDEX FAST FULL SCAN
创建表模拟测试

SQL> create table t_xifenfei as select object_id,object_name from dba_objects;
Table created.
SQL>  create index i_t_object_id on t_xifenfei(object_id);
Index created.
SQL> exec dbms_stats.gather_table_stats(USER,'T_XIFENFEI',cascade=>true);
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> desc t_xifenfei
 Name                                      Null?    Type
 ----------------------------------------- -------- ----------------------------
 OBJECT_ID                                          NUMBER
 OBJECT_NAME                                        VARCHAR2(128)

TABLE ACCESS FULL

SQL> SET AUTOT TRACE EXP STAT
SQL> SELECT OBJECT_ID FROM T_XIFENFEI;
49838 rows selected.
Execution Plan
----------------------------------------------------------
Plan hash value: 548923532
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id  | Operation         | Name       | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT  |            | 49838 |   243K|    57   (2)| 00:00:01 |
|   1 |  TABLE ACCESS FULL| T_XIFENFEI | 49838 |   243K|    57   (2)| 00:00:01 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Statistics
----------------------------------------------------------
          1  recursive calls
          0  db block gets
       3544  consistent gets
          0  physical reads
          0  redo size
     721203  bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
      36927  bytes received via SQL*Net from client
       3324  SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
          0  sorts (memory)
          0  sorts (disk)
      49838  rows processed
SQL> SELECT /*+ INDEX(T i_t_object_id) */ OBJECT_ID FROM T_XIFENFEI;
49838 rows selected.
Execution Plan
----------------------------------------------------------
Plan hash value: 548923532
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id  | Operation         | Name       | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT  |            | 49838 |   243K|    57   (2)| 00:00:01 |
|   1 |  TABLE ACCESS FULL| T_XIFENFEI | 49838 |   243K|    57   (2)| 00:00:01 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Statistics
----------------------------------------------------------
          1  recursive calls
          0  db block gets
       3544  consistent gets
          0  physical reads
          0  redo size
     721203  bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
      36927  bytes received via SQL*Net from client
       3324  SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
          0  sorts (memory)
          0  sorts (disk)
      49838  rows processed

从上面的执行计划中可知,此时走了全表扫描. 由于我们需要查询的列为object_id,因此理论上只需要读取索引就应该可以返回所有数据,而此时为什么是全表扫描呢? 这是因为NULL值与索引的特性所决定的.即null值不会被存储到B树索引.因此应该为表 t_xifenfei 的列 object_id 添加 not null 约束.

INDEX FAST FULL SCAN

SQL> alter table t_xifenfei modify(object_id not null);
Table altered.
SQL> SELECT  object_id from t_xifenfei;
49838 rows selected.
Execution Plan
----------------------------------------------------------
Plan hash value: 2036340805
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id  | Operation            | Name          | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT     |               | 49838 |   243K|    27   (4)| 00:00:01 |
|   1 |  INDEX FAST FULL SCAN| I_T_OBJECT_ID | 49838 |   243K|    27   (4)| 00:00:01 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Statistics
----------------------------------------------------------
          1  recursive calls
          0  db block gets
       3432  consistent gets
          0  physical reads
          0  redo size
     721203  bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
      36927  bytes received via SQL*Net from client
       3324  SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
          0  sorts (memory)
          0  sorts (disk)
      49838  rows processed

INDEX FAST FULL SCAN:当在高速缓存中没有找到所需的索引块时,则根据db_file_multiblock_read_count的值进行多块读操作.对于索引的分支结构只是简单的获取,然后扫描所有的叶结点.其结果是导致索引结构没有访问,获取的数据没有根据索引键的顺序排序.INDEX FAST FULL SCAN使用multiblock_read,故产生db file scattered reads 事件.

INDEX RANGE SCAN

SQL> select object_id from t_xifenfei where object_id<10;
8 rows selected.
Execution Plan
----------------------------------------------------------
Plan hash value: 2197008162
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id  | Operation        | Name          | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT |               |     2 |    10 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|*  1 |  INDEX RANGE SCAN| I_T_OBJECT_ID |     2 |    10 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
---------------------------------------------------
   1 - access("OBJECT_ID"<10)
Statistics
----------------------------------------------------------
          1  recursive calls
          0  db block gets
          3  consistent gets
          0  physical reads
          0  redo size
        499  bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
        385  bytes received via SQL*Net from client
          2  SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
          0  sorts (memory)
          0  sorts (disk)
          8  rows processed
SQL> select /*+ index_ffs(t i_t_object_id) */ object_id from t_xifenfei t where object_id<10;
8 rows selected.
Execution Plan
----------------------------------------------------------
Plan hash value: 2036340805
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id  | Operation            | Name          | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT     |               |     2 |    10 |    27   (4)| 00:00:01 |
|*  1 |  INDEX FAST FULL SCAN| I_T_OBJECT_ID |     2 |    10 |    27   (4)| 00:00:01 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
---------------------------------------------------
   1 - filter("OBJECT_ID"<10)
Statistics
----------------------------------------------------------
          1  recursive calls
          0  db block gets
        118  consistent gets
          0  physical reads
          0  redo size
        499  bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
        385  bytes received via SQL*Net from client
          2  SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
          0  sorts (memory)
          0  sorts (disk)
          8  rows processed

这里可以看出index_ffs已经生效,但是对于这样的情况hint index_ffs效率一般来说不会太高.
<br>
<strong>INDEX FULL SCAN</strong>

SQL> SELECT /*+ INDEX(T i_t_object_id) */ object_id  from t_xifenfei t;
49838 rows selected.
Execution Plan
----------------------------------------------------------
Plan hash value: 431110666
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id  | Operation        | Name          | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT |               | 49838 |   243K|   113   (2)| 00:00:02 |
|   1 |  INDEX FULL SCAN | I_T_OBJECT_ID | 49838 |   243K|   113   (2)| 00:00:02 |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Statistics
----------------------------------------------------------
          1  recursive calls
          0  db block gets
       3426  consistent gets
          0  physical reads
          0  redo size
     721203  bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
      36927  bytes received via SQL*Net from client
       3324  SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
          0  sorts (memory)
          0  sorts (disk)
      49838  rows processed

INDEX FULL SCAN:完全按照索引存储的顺序依次访问整个索引树.当访问到叶结点之后,按照双向链表方式读取相连节点的值.换言之,对于索引上所有的数据是按照有序的方式来读取的.如果索引块没有在高速缓存中被找到时,则需要从数据文件中单块进行读取.对于需要读取大量数据的全索引扫描而言,这将使其变得低效.INDEX FULL SCAN使用single read,故产生db file sequential reads事件.新版的Oracle支持db file parallel reads方式.
HINT INDEX不会使用INDEX FAST FULL SCAN功能.

INDEX列ORDER BY

SQL> SELECT OBJECT_ID FROM T_XIFENFEI order by object_id ;
49838 rows selected.
Execution Plan
----------------------------------------------------------
Plan hash value: 431110666
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id  | Operation        | Name          | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT |               | 49838 |   243K|   113   (2)| 00:00:02 |
|   1 |  INDEX FULL SCAN | I_T_OBJECT_ID | 49838 |   243K|   113   (2)| 00:00:02 |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Statistics
----------------------------------------------------------
          1  recursive calls
          0  db block gets
       3426  consistent gets
          0  physical reads
          0  redo size
     721203  bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
      36927  bytes received via SQL*Net from client
       3324  SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
          0  sorts (memory)
          0  sorts (disk)
      49838  rows processed
SQL> SELECT OBJECT_ID FROM T_XIFENFEI order by object_id  desc;
49838 rows selected.
Execution Plan
----------------------------------------------------------
Plan hash value: 2808014233
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id  | Operation                  | Name          | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT           |               | 49838 |   243K|   113   (2)| 00:00:02 |
|   1 |  INDEX FULL SCAN DESCENDING| I_T_OBJECT_ID | 49838 |   243K|   113   (2)| 00:00:02 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Statistics
----------------------------------------------------------
          1  recursive calls
          0  db block gets
       3427  consistent gets
          0  physical reads
          0  redo size
     721203  bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
      36927  bytes received via SQL*Net from client
       3324  SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
          0  sorts (memory)
          0  sorts (disk)
      49838  rows processed
SQL> SELECT  /*+ index_ffs(t i_t_object_id) */ object_id from t_xifenfei t order by object_id;
49838 rows selected.
Execution Plan
----------------------------------------------------------
Plan hash value: 2527678987
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id  | Operation             | Name          | Rows  | Bytes |TempSpc| Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT      |               | 49838 |   243K|       |   185   (4)| 00:00:03 |
|   1 |  SORT ORDER BY        |               | 49838 |   243K|  1192K|   185   (4)| 00:00:03 |
|   2 |   INDEX FAST FULL SCAN| I_T_OBJECT_ID | 49838 |   243K|       |    27   (4)| 00:00:01 |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Statistics
----------------------------------------------------------
          1  recursive calls
          0  db block gets
        117  consistent gets
          0  physical reads
          0  redo size
     721203  bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
      36927  bytes received via SQL*Net from client
       3324  SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
          1  sorts (memory)
          0  sorts (disk)
      49838  rows processed

对于index 列排序,默认情况下会使用INDEX FULL SCAN/INDEX FULL SCAN DESCENDING而不选择使用INDEX FAST FULL SCAN,因为INDEX FAST FULL SCAN获得数据后,还需要做一次SORT ORDER BY操作

INDEX FAST FULL SCAN+SORT AGGREGATE

SQL> SELECT  count(object_id) FROM T_XIFENFEI;
Execution Plan
----------------------------------------------------------
Plan hash value: 3095383276
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id  | Operation             | Name          | Rows  | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT      |               |     1 |    27   (4)| 00:00:01 |
|   1 |  SORT AGGREGATE       |               |     1 |            |          |
|   2 |   INDEX FAST FULL SCAN| I_T_OBJECT_ID | 49838 |    27   (4)| 00:00:01 |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Statistics
----------------------------------------------------------
          1  recursive calls
          0  db block gets
        117  consistent gets
          0  physical reads
          0  redo size
        421  bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
        385  bytes received via SQL*Net from client
          2  SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
          0  sorts (memory)
          0  sorts (disk)
          1  rows processed
SQL> SELECT  /*+ INDEX(T i_t_object_id) */ count(object_id) FROM T_XIFENFEI t;
Execution Plan
----------------------------------------------------------
Plan hash value: 3079973526
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id  | Operation        | Name          | Rows  | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT |               |     1 |   113   (2)| 00:00:02 |
|   1 |  SORT AGGREGATE  |               |     1 |            |          |
|   2 |   INDEX FULL SCAN| I_T_OBJECT_ID | 49838 |   113   (2)| 00:00:02 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Statistics
----------------------------------------------------------
          1  recursive calls
          0  db block gets
        111  consistent gets
          0  physical reads
          0  redo size
        421  bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
        385  bytes received via SQL*Net from client
          2  SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
          0  sorts (memory)
          0  sorts (disk)
          1  rows processed

sort aggregate通常发生在使用一些聚合函数的时候,sum(),avg(),min(),max(),count()等等,实际上sort aggregate不做真正的sort,并不会用到排序空间,而是通过一个全局变量+全表或全索引扫描来实现.这样的操作在默认情况下使用INDEX FAST FULL SCAN

INDEX FULL SCAN (MIN/MAX)

SQL> SELECT  max(object_id) FROM T_XIFENFEI;
Execution Plan
----------------------------------------------------------
Plan hash value: 2939893782
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id  | Operation                  | Name          | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT           |               |     1 |     5 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   1 |  SORT AGGREGATE            |               |     1 |     5 |            |          |
|   2 |   INDEX FULL SCAN (MIN/MAX)| I_T_OBJECT_ID | 49838 |   243K|     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Statistics
----------------------------------------------------------
          1  recursive calls
          0  db block gets
          2  consistent gets
          0  physical reads
          0  redo size
        419  bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
        385  bytes received via SQL*Net from client
          2  SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
          0  sorts (memory)
          0  sorts (disk)
          1  rows processed
SQL>  SELECT /*+ index_ffs(t i_t_object_id) */ max(object_id) FROM T_XIFENFEI t;
Execution Plan
----------------------------------------------------------
Plan hash value: 2939893782
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id  | Operation                  | Name          | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT           |               |     1 |     5 |    27   (4)| 00:00:01 |
|   1 |  SORT AGGREGATE            |               |     1 |     5 |            |          |
|   2 |   INDEX FULL SCAN (MIN/MAX)| I_T_OBJECT_ID | 49838 |   243K|    27   (4)| 00:00:01 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Statistics
----------------------------------------------------------
          1  recursive calls
          0  db block gets
          2  consistent gets
          0  physical reads
          0  redo size
        419  bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
        385  bytes received via SQL*Net from client
          2  SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
          0  sorts (memory)
          0  sorts (disk)
          1  rows processed

对于这样的查询INDEX FULL SCAN (MIN/MAX)明显是最优,但是此处奇怪的是使用了index_ffs提示无效,如果有知道的朋友,麻烦告知原因.

ORA-00600[KSSADP1]

检查数据库发现ORA-00600[KSSADP1]错误

Thu Apr 19 21:16:45 2012
Errors in file /oracle9/app/admin/crm/udump/crm1_ora_442896.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [KSSADP1], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
Thu Apr 19 21:16:45 2012
Errors in file /oracle9/app/admin/crm/udump/crm1_ora_442896.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [KSSADP1], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
Thu Apr 19 21:16:45 2012
Trace dumping is performing id=[cdmp_20120419211645]
Thu Apr 19 21:16:46 2012
Errors in file /oracle9/app/admin/crm/udump/crm1_ora_442896.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [KSSADP1], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
Thu Apr 19 21:16:47 2012
Errors in file /oracle9/app/admin/crm/udump/crm1_ora_442896.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [KSSADP1], [], [], [], [], [], [], []

分析crm1_ora_442896.trc信息

Oracle9i Enterprise Edition Release 9.2.0.8.0 - 64bit Production
With the Partitioning, Real Application Clusters, OLAP and Oracle Data Mining options
JServer Release 9.2.0.8.0 - Production
ORACLE_HOME = /oracle9/app/product/9.2.0
System name:    AIX
Node name:      zwq_crm1
Release:        3
Version:        5
Machine:        00C420B44C00
Instance name: crm1
Redo thread mounted by this instance: 1
Oracle process number: 2354
Unix process pid: 442896, image: oracle@zwq_crm1 (TNS V1-V3)
*** SESSION ID:(927.39278) 2012-04-19 21:16:45.317
*** 2012-04-19 21:16:45.317
ksedmp: internal or fatal error
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [KSSADP1], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
----- Call Stack Trace -----
calling              call     entry                argument values in hex
location             type     point                (? means dubious value)
-------------------- -------- -------------------- ----------------------------
ksedmp+0148          bl       ksedst               1029746FC ?
ksfdmp+0018          bl       01FD4014
kgerinv+00e8         bl       _ptrgl
kgesinv+0020         bl       kgerinv              9001000A02B56F8 ?
                                                   9001000A02B9450 ?
                                                   FFFFFFFFFFF8430 ? 000000458 ?
                                                   900000000CBAFA4 ?
ksesin+005c          bl       kgesinv              FFFFFFFFFFF88E0 ? 1101FAF78 ?
                                                   900000000C0ECC0 ? 000010000 ?
                                                   000000002 ?
kssadpm_stage+00c4   bl       ksesin               102973C84 ? 000000000 ?
                                                   00000001E ? 000000000 ?
                                                   000000069 ? 00000000C ?
                                                   000000000 ? 000000000 ?
ksqgel+0138          bl       kssadpm_stage        000000000 ? 000000000 ?
                                                   000000000 ? 000000000 ?
kcftis+003c          bl       ksqgel               000000000 ? 4029C61E0 ?
                                                   000000002 ? 0FFFFC16C ?
                                                   102A7977C ? 000000000 ?
                                                   000000003 ? 002A36408 ?
kcfhis+001c          bl       kcftis
krbbcc+0238          bl       kcfhis               11043B590 ?
krbpgc+001c          bl       krbbcc
ksmupg+0074          bl       _ptrgl
ksuded+00b8          bl       ksmupg               102924988 ? 000000020 ?
ksupucg+10ec         bl       ksuded               700000C376F5740 ? 000000000 ?
                                                   000000000 ?
opiodr+0474          bl       ksupucg              100000001 ?
ttcpip+0cc4          bl       _ptrgl
opitsk+0d60          bl       ttcpip               11000CF90 ?
                                                   442442216B736800 ?
                                                   FFFFFFFFFFFBF00 ? 1102E04BC ?
                                                   1102D7D20 ? 0000006A0 ?
                                                   1102D83C0 ? 0000006A0 ?
opiino+0758          bl       opitsk               000000000 ? 000000000 ?
opiodr+08cc          bl       _ptrgl
opidrv+032c          bl       opiodr               3C00000018 ? 4101FAF78 ?
                                                   FFFFFFFFFFFF840 ? 0A000F350 ?
sou2o+0028           bl       opidrv               3C0C000000 ? 4A00E8B50 ?
                                                   FFFFFFFFFFFF840 ?
main+0138            bl       01FD3A28
__start+0098         bl       main                 000000000 ? 000000000 ?
--------------------- Binary Stack Dump ---------------------
Cursor Dump:
----------------------------------------
Cursor 1 (110360418): CURROW  curiob: 110369b78
 curflg: 46 curpar: 0 curusr: 0 curses 700000c376f5740
 cursor name: select nvl(max(cpmid),0) from x$kcccp                                        where cpsta = 2
 child pin: 0, child lock: 700000d9b9c5bb8, parent lock: 700000d088e0fa0
 xscflg: 1100024, parent handle: 70000031d588d88, xscfl2: 4040401
 bhp size: 160/600
----------------------------------------
Cursor 2 (110360468): CURBOUND  curiob: 1103656f0
 curflg: c7 curpar: 0 curusr: 0 curses 700000c376f5740
 cursor name: SELECT SUBSTR(VERSION,1,INSTR(VERSION,'.') - 1 )   FROM V$INSTANCE
 child pin: 0, child lock: 700000d21e60930, parent lock: 700000327837ce0
 xscflg: 141024, parent handle: 700000304e2f020, xscfl2: 4000401
 bhp size: 160/600
----------------------------------------
Cursor 3 (1103604b8): CURBOUND  curiob: 1103b6aa8
 curflg: c7 curpar: 0 curusr: 0 curses 700000c376f5740
 cursor name: SELECT SUBSTR(VERSION,1 + INSTR(VERSION,'.',1,1) ,INSTR(VERSION,'.',1,2) -
 INSTR(VERSION,'.',1,1)  - 1 )   FROM V$INSTANCE
 child pin: 0, child lock: 700000d5e382ee8, parent lock: 700000c93581d40
 xscflg: 141024, parent handle: 700000d73daa1c0, xscfl2: 4000401
 bhp size: 160/600
----------------------------------------
Cursor 4 (110360508): CURBOUND  curiob: 1103b66b8
 curflg: c7 curpar: 0 curusr: 0 curses 700000c376f5740
 cursor name: SELECT SUBSTR(VERSION,1 + INSTR(VERSION,'.',1,2) ,INSTR(VERSION,'.',1,3) -
 INSTR(VERSION,'.',1,2)  - 1 )   FROM V$INSTANCE
 child pin: 0, child lock: 700000d16de7978, parent lock: 700000c44059d30
 xscflg: 141024, parent handle: 700000259c4a700, xscfl2: 4000401
 bhp size: 160/600
----------------------------------------
Cursor 5 (110360558): CURBOUND  curiob: 1103b3868
 curflg: 46 curpar: 0 curusr: 0 curses 700000c376f5740
 cursor name: SELECT SYSDATE   FROM SYS.DUAL
 child pin: 0, child lock: 700000d589cea48, parent lock: 70000026b311fb0
 xscflg: 100024, parent handle: 700000d2eaee328, xscfl2: 4600409
 bhp size: 280/632
----------------------------------------
Cursor 6 (1103605a8): CURBOUND  curiob: 1103b3408
 curflg: 46 curpar: 0 curusr: 0 curses 700000c376f5740
 cursor name: SELECT TO_CHAR(SYSDATE,'YYYY','NLS_CALENDAR=Gregorian'),TO_CHAR(SYSDATE,'MM','NLS_CALENDAR=Gregorian'),
TO_CHAR(SYSDATE,'DD','NLS_CALENDAR=Gregorian') FROM X$DUAL
 child pin: 0, child lock: 70000033f1753c8, parent lock: 700000db8c6dd18
 xscflg: 100024, parent handle: 700000cbc6ad8b0, xscfl2: 4600409
 bhp size: 160/600
End of cursor dump
ksedmp: no current context area
----- Dump of the Fixed PGA -----

找到相关文档Note:262996.1,经过分析,产生错误的原因是由在本版本的数据库中SGA管理中存在的漏洞造成,但此错误没有对数据库的数据造成损坏及性能影响.

处理建议
1.当前版本ORACLE已经不再提供补丁支持,建议升级到高版本解决(有sr中介绍10.2中解决);
2.由于此报错并没有对数据库的数据及性能造成损坏及影响,可以忽此错误。

记录一次ARC1: Destination LOG_ARCHIVE_DEST_2 network reconnect abandoned解决

Data Guard主库出现如下错误
导致归档日志不同通过LOG_ARCHIVE_DEST_2传输到备库

Thu Apr 19 19:58:40 2012
Errors in file /u01/app/oracle/admin/orcl/udump/orcl_ora_6756.trc:
Thu Apr 19 19:58:40 2012
Errors in file /u01/app/oracle/admin/orcl/udump/orcl_ora_6756.trc:
Thu Apr 19 19:58:40 2012
Errors in file /u01/app/oracle/admin/orcl/udump/orcl_ora_6756.trc:
Thu Apr 19 20:00:26 2012
ARC1: Attempting destination LOG_ARCHIVE_DEST_2 network reconnect (3113)
ARC1: Destination LOG_ARCHIVE_DEST_2 network reconnect abandoned
PING[ARC1]: Error 3113 when pinging standby standby.
Thu Apr 19 20:18:18 2012
Errors in file /u01/app/oracle/admin/orcl/udump/orcl_ora_6756.trc:
Thu Apr 19 20:18:18 2012
Errors in file /u01/app/oracle/admin/orcl/udump/orcl_ora_6756.trc:
Thu Apr 19 20:18:18 2012
Errors in file /u01/app/oracle/admin/orcl/udump/orcl_ora_6756.trc:
Thu Apr 19 20:33:27 2012
ARC1: Attempting destination LOG_ARCHIVE_DEST_2 network reconnect (3113)
ARC1: Destination LOG_ARCHIVE_DEST_2 network reconnect abandoned
[oracle@localhost ~]$ oerr ora 3113
03113, 00000, "end-of-file on communication channel"
// *Cause: The connection between Client and Server process was broken.
// *Action: There was a communication error that requires further investigation.
//          First, check for network problems and review the SQL*Net setup.
//          Also, look in the alert.log file for any errors. Finally, test to
//          see whether the server process is dead and whether a trace file
//          was generated at failure time.
提示连接错误

orcl_ora_6756.trc文件内容
这里没有得任何重要的有效信息

Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.1.0 - 64bit Production
With the Partitioning, OLAP and Data Mining options
ORACLE_HOME = /u01/app/oracle/product/10.2.0/db_1
System name:    Linux
Node name:      fcdb1
Release:        2.6.18-194.el5
Version:        #1 SMP Fri Apr 2 14:58:14 EDT 2010
Machine:        x86_64
Instance name: orcl
Redo thread mounted by this instance: 1
Oracle process number: 21
Unix process pid: 6756, image: oracle@fcdb1 (TNS V1-V3)
*** 2012-04-19 19:51:32.033
*** ACTION NAME:(0000045 STARTED16) 2012-04-19 19:51:32.026
*** MODULE NAME:(backup incr datafile) 2012-04-19 19:51:32.026
*** SERVICE NAME:(SYS$USERS) 2012-04-19 19:51:32.026
*** SESSION ID:(1518.294) 2012-04-19 19:51:32.026
*** ACTION NAME:(0000062 STARTED68) 2012-04-19 19:58:40.083
*** MODULE NAME:(backup full datafile) 2012-04-19 19:58:40.083
*** 2012-04-19 19:58:40.083
*** ACTION NAME:(0000068 STARTED16) 2012-04-19 19:58:40.156
*** 2012-04-19 20:18:18.436
*** ACTION NAME:(0000118 STARTED16) 2012-04-19 20:18:18.436
*** MODULE NAME:(backup incr datafile) 2012-04-19 20:18:18.436

查看相关参数

SQL> show parameter archive;
NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
------------------------------------ ----------- ------------------------------
log_archive_config                   string      DG_CONFIG=(primary,standby)
log_archive_dest_1                   string      LOCATION=/u01/app/oracle/arch
                                                 VALID_FOR=(ALL_LOGFILES,ALL_RO
                                                 LES) DB_UNIQUE_NAME=primary
log_archive_dest_2                   string      SERVICE=standby LGWR ASYNC VAL
                                                 ID_FOR=(ONLINE_LOGFILES,PRIMAR
                                                 Y_ROLE) DB_UNIQUE_NAME=standby
log_archive_dest_state_1             string      ENABLE
log_archive_dest_state_2             string      ENABLE

测试TNS

[oracle@fcdb1 bdump]$ tnsping standby
TNS Ping Utility for Linux: Version 10.2.0.1.0 - Production on 19-APR-2012 20:47:51
Copyright (c) 1997, 2005, Oracle.  All rights reserved.
Used parameter files:
Used TNSNAMES adapter to resolve the alias
Attempting to contact (DESCRIPTION = (ADDRESS_LIST = (ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST = 192.168.1.203)(PORT = 1521)))
(CONNECT_DATA = (SERVER = DEDICATED) (SERVICE_NAME = orcl)))
OK (0 msec)
[oracle@fcdb1 bdump]$ sqlplus sys/oracle@standby as sysdba
SQL*Plus: Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Production on Thu Apr 19 20:49:05 2012
Copyright (c) 1982, 2005, Oracle.  All rights reserved.
Connected to:
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.1.0 - 64bit Production
With the Partitioning, OLAP and Data Mining options

问题原因分析
从log_archive_dest_2 参数上可以看出默认是配置lgwr进程传输日志,但是因为备库没有配置standby redo log,所以使得启动arch传输日志,然后出现该问题,因为在传输过程中出现异常,导致arch不能继续和备库建立连接。

解决方法
查看了很多资料,给出的解决方法都是重启主库或者备库解决,我想既然是ARCH建立连接的失败,那么重启log_archive_dest_state_2参数,让arch进程重启。

SQL> ALTER SYSTEM SET log_archive_dest_state_2='DEFER' SCOPE=BOTH;
System altered.
SQL> ALTER SYSTEM SET log_archive_dest_state_2='ENABLE' SCOPE=BOTH;
System altered.
SQL> alter system switch logfile;
System altered.
--alert日志
Thu Apr 19 20:51:12 2012
ALTER SYSTEM SET log_archive_dest_state_2='DEFER' SCOPE=BOTH;
Thu Apr 19 20:51:32 2012
ALTER SYSTEM SET log_archive_dest_state_2='ENABLE' SCOPE=BOTH;
LNS1 started with pid=35, OS id=7012
Thu Apr 19 20:51:47 2012
Thread 1 advanced to log sequence 2025
  Current log# 2 seq# 2025 mem# 0: /u01/app/oracle/oradata/orcl/redo02.log
Thu Apr 19 20:51:48 2012
******************************************************************
LGWR: Setting 'active' archival for destination LOG_ARCHIVE_DEST_2
******************************************************************
Thu Apr 19 20:52:02 2012
Thread 1 advanced to log sequence 2026
  Current log# 3 seq# 2026 mem# 0: /u01/app/oracle/oradata/orcl/redo03.log
Thread 1 cannot allocate new log, sequence 2027

这个时候,查看备库日志也已经传输过去,通过修改log_archive_dest_state_2解决

ARC1: Attempting destination LOG_ARCHIVE_DEST_2 network reconnect (3113)
ARC1: Destination LOG_ARCHIVE_DEST_2 network reconnect abandoned

利用scn增量备份实现数据库增量恢复

数据库版本

SQL> select * from v$version;
BANNER
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.3.0 - Production
PL/SQL Release 11.2.0.3.0 - Production
CORE    11.2.0.3.0      Production
TNS for Linux: Version 11.2.0.3.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 11.2.0.3.0 - Production

全备数据库

RMAN> backup as compressed backupset database  format '/u01/oracle/oradata/tmp/ora11g_0_%U';
Starting backup at 18-APR-12
using channel ORA_DISK_1
channel ORA_DISK_1: starting compressed full datafile backup set
channel ORA_DISK_1: specifying datafile(s) in backup set
input datafile file number=00001 name=/u01/oracle/oradata/ora11g/system01.dbf
input datafile file number=00002 name=/u01/oracle/oradata/ora11g/sysaux01.dbf
input datafile file number=00003 name=/u01/oracle/oradata/ora11g/undotbs01.dbf
input datafile file number=00004 name=/u01/oracle/oradata/ora11g/users01.dbf
input datafile file number=00006 name=/u01/oracle/oradata/ora11g/xifenfei02.dbf
channel ORA_DISK_1: starting piece 1 at 18-APR-12
channel ORA_DISK_1: finished piece 1 at 18-APR-12
piece handle=/u01/oracle/oradata/tmp/ora11g_0_07n8p916_1_1 tag=TAG20120418T234958 comment=NONE
channel ORA_DISK_1: backup set complete, elapsed time: 00:01:15
channel ORA_DISK_1: starting compressed full datafile backup set
channel ORA_DISK_1: specifying datafile(s) in backup set
including current control file in backup set
including current SPFILE in backup set
channel ORA_DISK_1: starting piece 1 at 18-APR-12
channel ORA_DISK_1: finished piece 1 at 18-APR-12
piece handle=/u01/oracle/oradata/tmp/ora11g_0_08n8p93h_1_1 tag=TAG20120418T234958 comment=NONE
channel ORA_DISK_1: backup set complete, elapsed time: 00:00:01
Finished backup at 18-APR-12

创建测试数据库验证恢复标准

SQL> conn chf/xifenfei
Connected.
SQL> drop table xifenfei purge;
Table dropped.
SQL> create table xifenfei as
  2  select * from dba_objects;
Table created.
SQL> insert into xifenfei
  2  select * from dba_objects;
74534 rows created.
SQL> /
74534 rows created.
SQL> /
74534 rows created.
SQL> commit;
Commit complete.
SQL> select count(*) from xifenfei;
  COUNT(*)
----------
    298136
SQL> create table xifenfei01 as
  2  select * from dba_objects;
Table created.
SQL> alter system switch logfile;
System altered.
SQL> /
System altered.
SQL> /
System altered.
SQL> /
System altered.
SQL> create table chf.xifenfei02 as
  2  select * from dba_objects;
Table created.
SQL> alter system switch logfile;
System altered.

异机恢复库

RMAN> restore controlfile from '/u01/oracle/oradata/tmp/ora11g_0_08n8p93h_1_1';
Starting restore at 19-APR-12
using channel ORA_DISK_1
channel ORA_DISK_1: restoring control file
channel ORA_DISK_1: restore complete, elapsed time: 00:00:01
output file name=/u01/oracle/oradata/ora11g/control01.ctl
output file name=/u01/oracle/oradata/ora11g/control02.ctl
Finished restore at 19-APR-12
RMAN> alter database mount;
database mounted
released channel: ORA_DISK_1
RMAN> list backup;
List of Backup Sets
===================
BS Key  Type LV Size       Device Type Elapsed Time Completion Time
------- ---- -- ---------- ----------- ------------ ---------------
7       Full    262.79M    DISK        00:01:08     18-APR-12
        BP Key: 7   Status: AVAILABLE  Compressed: YES  Tag: TAG20120418T234958
        Piece Name: /u01/oracle/oradata/tmp/ora11g_0_07n8p916_1_1
  List of Datafiles in backup set 7
  File LV Type Ckp SCN    Ckp Time  Name
  ---- -- ---- ---------- --------- ----
  1       Full 1155510    18-APR-12 /u01/oracle/oradata/ora11g/system01.dbf
  2       Full 1155510    18-APR-12 /u01/oracle/oradata/ora11g/sysaux01.dbf
  3       Full 1155510    18-APR-12 /u01/oracle/oradata/ora11g/undotbs01.dbf
  4       Full 1155510    18-APR-12 /u01/oracle/oradata/ora11g/users01.dbf
  6       Full 1155510    18-APR-12 /u01/oracle/oradata/ora11g/xifenfei02.dbf
--这里可以发现备份时的scn,增量备份时取这里的最小scn为起点
--为了排除影响,删除所有归档日志记录
RMAN> delete archivelog all;
RMAN> list archivelog all;
specification does not match any archived log in the repository
RMAN> restore database;
Starting restore at 19-APR-12
using channel ORA_DISK_1
channel ORA_DISK_1: starting datafile backup set restore
channel ORA_DISK_1: specifying datafile(s) to restore from backup set
channel ORA_DISK_1: restoring datafile 00001 to /u01/oracle/oradata/ora11g/system01.dbf
channel ORA_DISK_1: restoring datafile 00002 to /u01/oracle/oradata/ora11g/sysaux01.dbf
channel ORA_DISK_1: restoring datafile 00003 to /u01/oracle/oradata/ora11g/undotbs01.dbf
channel ORA_DISK_1: restoring datafile 00004 to /u01/oracle/oradata/ora11g/users01.dbf
channel ORA_DISK_1: restoring datafile 00006 to /u01/oracle/oradata/ora11g/xifenfei02.dbf
channel ORA_DISK_1: reading from backup piece /u01/oracle/oradata/tmp/ora11g_0_07n8p916_1_1
channel ORA_DISK_1: piece handle=/u01/oracle/oradata/tmp/ora11g_0_07n8p916_1_1 tag=TAG20120418T234958
channel ORA_DISK_1: restored backup piece 1
channel ORA_DISK_1: restore complete, elapsed time: 00:01:36
Finished restore at 19-APR-12
[oracle@xifenfei oradata]$ sqlplus / as sysdba
SQL*Plus: Release 11.2.0.3.0 Production on Thu Apr 19 00:54:42 2012
Copyright (c) 1982, 2011, Oracle.  All rights reserved.
Connected to:
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.3.0 - Production
With the Partitioning, OLAP, Data Mining and Real Application Testing options
SQL> select file#,to_char(checkpoint_change#,'9999999999999999') "SCN",
  2  to_char(RESETLOGS_CHANGE#,'9999999999999999') "RESETLOGS SCN"
  3  from v$datafile_header;
     FILE# SCN                                RESETLOGS SCN
---------- ---------------------------------- ----------------------------------
         1           1155510                             787897
         2           1155510                             787897
         3           1155510                             787897
         4           1155510                             787897
         6           1155510                             787897
SQL> select file#,to_char(checkpoint_change#,'999999999999999') "SCN",
  2  to_char(last_change#,'999999999999999')"STOP_SCN" from v$datafile;
     FILE# SCN                              STOP_SCN
---------- -------------------------------- --------------------------------
         1          1155510
         2          1155510
         3          1155510
         4          1155510
         6          1155510

基于scn增量备份

RMAN> BACKUP INCREMENTAL FROM SCN 1155510 DATABASE
2> FORMAT '/u01/oracle/oradata/tmp/ora11_scn_%U' tag 'XIFENFEI';
Starting backup at 19-APR-12
using target database control file instead of recovery catalog
allocated channel: ORA_DISK_1
channel ORA_DISK_1: SID=125 device type=DISK
backup will be obsolete on date 26-APR-12
archived logs will not be kept or backed up
channel ORA_DISK_1: starting full datafile backup set
channel ORA_DISK_1: specifying datafile(s) in backup set
input datafile file number=00001 name=/u01/oracle/oradata/ora11g/system01.dbf
input datafile file number=00002 name=/u01/oracle/oradata/ora11g/sysaux01.dbf
input datafile file number=00003 name=/u01/oracle/oradata/ora11g/undotbs01.dbf
input datafile file number=00004 name=/u01/oracle/oradata/ora11g/users01.dbf
input datafile file number=00006 name=/u01/oracle/oradata/ora11g/xifenfei02.dbf
channel ORA_DISK_1: starting piece 1 at 19-APR-12
channel ORA_DISK_1: finished piece 1 at 19-APR-12
piece handle=/u01/oracle/oradata/tmp/ora11_scn_0bn8pbsd_1_1 tag=XIFENFEI comment=NONE
channel ORA_DISK_1: backup set complete, elapsed time: 00:00:45
using channel ORA_DISK_1
backup will be obsolete on date 26-APR-12
archived logs will not be kept or backed up
channel ORA_DISK_1: starting full datafile backup set
channel ORA_DISK_1: specifying datafile(s) in backup set
including current control file in backup set
channel ORA_DISK_1: starting piece 1 at 19-APR-12
channel ORA_DISK_1: finished piece 1 at 19-APR-12
piece handle=/u01/oracle/oradata/tmp/ora11_scn_0cn8pbtq_1_1 tag=XIFENFEI comment=NONE
channel ORA_DISK_1: backup set complete, elapsed time: 00:00:01
Finished backup at 19-APR-12

增量恢复

RMAN> catalog start with '/u01/oracle/oradata/tmp/ora11_scn_09n8pa5h_1_1';
searching for all files that match the pattern /u01/oracle/oradata/tmp/ora11_scn_09n8pa5h_1_1
List of Files Unknown to the Database
=====================================
File Name: /u01/oracle/oradata/tmp/ora11_scn_09n8pa5h_1_1
Do you really want to catalog the above files (enter YES or NO)? yes
cataloging files...
cataloging done
List of Cataloged Files
=======================
File Name: /u01/oracle/oradata/tmp/ora11_scn_09n8pa5h_1_1
RMAN> recover database;
Starting recover at 19-APR-12
using target database control file instead of recovery catalog
allocated channel: ORA_DISK_1
channel ORA_DISK_1: SID=125 device type=DISK
channel ORA_DISK_1: starting incremental datafile backup set restore
channel ORA_DISK_1: specifying datafile(s) to restore from backup set
destination for restore of datafile 00001: /u01/oracle/oradata/ora11g/system01.dbf
destination for restore of datafile 00002: /u01/oracle/oradata/ora11g/sysaux01.dbf
destination for restore of datafile 00003: /u01/oracle/oradata/ora11g/undotbs01.dbf
destination for restore of datafile 00004: /u01/oracle/oradata/ora11g/users01.dbf
destination for restore of datafile 00006: /u01/oracle/oradata/ora11g/xifenfei02.dbf
channel ORA_DISK_1: reading from backup piece /u01/oracle/oradata/tmp/ora11_scn_0bn8pbsd_1_1
channel ORA_DISK_1: piece handle=/u01/oracle/oradata/tmp/ora11_scn_0bn8pbsd_1_1.bak tag=XIFENFEI
channel ORA_DISK_1: restored backup piece 1
channel ORA_DISK_1: restore complete, elapsed time: 00:00:07
starting media recovery
--这里表现出来的是利用归档日志恢复,实质是基于scn增量备份的备份集恢复
archived log file name=/u01/oracle/oradata/archivelog/ora11g/1_49_777766629.dbf thread=1 sequence=49
archived log file name=/u01/oracle/oradata/archivelog/ora11g/1_50_777766629.dbf thread=1 sequence=50
archived log file name=/u01/oracle/oradata/archivelog/ora11g/1_51_777766629.dbf thread=1 sequence=51
archived log file name=/u01/oracle/oradata/archivelog/ora11g/1_52_777766629.dbf thread=1 sequence=52
archived log file name=/u01/oracle/oradata/archivelog/ora11g/1_53_777766629.dbf thread=1 sequence=53
archived log file name=/u01/oracle/oradata/archivelog/ora11g/1_54_777766629.dbf thread=1 sequence=54
archived log file name=/u01/oracle/oradata/archivelog/ora11g/1_55_777766629.dbf thread=1 sequence=55
archived log file name=/u01/oracle/oradata/archivelog/ora11g/1_56_777766629.dbf thread=1 sequence=56
archived log file name=/u01/oracle/oradata/archivelog/ora11g/1_57_777766629.dbf thread=1 sequence=57
unable to find archived log
archived log thread=1 sequence=58
RMAN-00571: ===========================================================
RMAN-00569: =============== ERROR MESSAGE STACK FOLLOWS ===============
RMAN-00571: ===========================================================
RMAN-03002: failure of recover command at 04/19/2012 00:55:48
RMAN-06054: media recovery requesting unknown archived log for thread 1 with sequence 58 and starting SCN of 1157379
SQL> select file#,to_char(checkpoint_change#,'9999999999999999') "SCN",
  2  to_char(RESETLOGS_CHANGE#,'9999999999999999') "RESETLOGS SCN"
  3  from v$datafile_header;
     FILE# SCN                                RESETLOGS SCN
---------- ---------------------------------- ----------------------------------
         1           1157379                             787897
         2           1157379                             787897
         3           1157379                             787897
         4           1157379                             787897
         6           1157379                             787897
SQL> select file#,to_char(checkpoint_change#,'999999999999999') "SCN",
  2  to_char(last_change#,'999999999999999')"STOP_SCN" from v$datafile;
     FILE# SCN                              STOP_SCN
---------- -------------------------------- --------------------------------
         1          1157379
         2          1157379
         3          1157379
         4          1157379
         6          1157379
SQL> alter database open resetlogs;
Database altered.
SQL> select count(*) from chf.xifenfei;
  COUNT(*)
----------
    298136
SQL> select TABLE_NAME from dba_tables where table_name LIKE 'XIFENFEI%';
TABLE_NAME
------------------------------------------------------------
XIFENFEI02
XIFENFEI01
XIFENFEI

使用rman基于scn实现数据库增量恢复是在dg中修复gap的时候常见的方法,其实该方法也可以使用常规的增量恢复,通过人工控制,实现数据库的某种特殊的业务需求(特殊的数据迁移).处理思路主要是获得备库的数据文件最小scn(这个scn可能是通过全备恢复或者增量恢复产生),然后基于该SCN实现数据库增量备份,然后利用该备份进行增量恢复.

DB2日志参数介绍和修改归档模式

cfg关于log参数

[db2inst1@xifenfei ~]$ db2 get db cfg for xff|grep -i log
 Log retain for recovery status                          = NO
 User exit for logging status                            = NO
 Catalog cache size (4KB)              (CATALOGCACHE_SZ) = 260
 Log buffer size (4KB)                        (LOGBUFSZ) = 98
 Log file size (4KB)                         (LOGFILSIZ) = 1024
 Number of primary log files                (LOGPRIMARY) = 13
 Number of secondary log files               (LOGSECOND) = 4
 Changed path to log files                  (NEWLOGPATH) =
 Path to log files                                       = /home/db2inst1/db2inst1/NODE0000/SQL00003/SQLOGDIR/
 Overflow log path                     (OVERFLOWLOGPATH) =
 Mirror log path                         (MIRRORLOGPATH) =
 First active log file                                   =
 Block log on disk full                (BLK_LOG_DSK_FUL) = NO
 Block non logged operations            (BLOCKNONLOGGED) = NO
 Percent max primary log space by transaction  (MAX_LOG) = 0
 Num. of active log files for 1 active UOW(NUM_LOG_SPAN) = 0
 Percent log file reclaimed before soft chckpt (SOFTMAX) = 520
 Log retain for recovery enabled             (LOGRETAIN) = OFF
 User exit for logging enabled                (USEREXIT) = OFF
 HADR log write synchronization mode     (HADR_SYNCMODE) = NEARSYNC
 First log archive method                 (LOGARCHMETH1) = OFF
 Options for logarchmeth1                  (LOGARCHOPT1) =
 Second log archive method                (LOGARCHMETH2) = OFF
 Options for logarchmeth2                  (LOGARCHOPT2) =
 Failover log archive path                (FAILARCHPATH) =
 Number of log archive retries on error   (NUMARCHRETRY) = 5
 Log archive retry Delay (secs)         (ARCHRETRYDELAY) = 20
 Log pages during index build            (LOGINDEXBUILD) = OFF

LOGPRIMARY:主日志组日志文件个数(首次连接或激活时直接分配)
LOGSECOND:辅助日志组日志文件个数(主日志文件写满时按需分配)
LOGFILSIZ:每个日志文件页数,每页大小为4K
LOGARCHMETH1/LOGARCHMETH2:OFF表示循环模式,其他值表示归档模式(disk:/xifenfei/archive)
NEWLOGPATH:修改新的日志路径
LOGBUFSZ:日志缓冲区大小
MIRRORLOGPATH:日志镜像路径
LOGRETAIN:归档日志保留在日志文件中(不推荐该做法)
USEREXIT:归档日志通过用户出口程序管理(8.2后不推荐该做法)

当前日志位置

[db2inst1@xifenfei ~]$ ls -l /home/db2inst1/db2inst1/NODE0000/SQL00003/SQLOGDIR/
total 53404
-rw-------  1 db2inst1 db2iadm1 4202496 Apr  5 16:20 S0000000.LOG
-rw-------  1 db2inst1 db2iadm1 4202496 Apr  5 16:20 S0000001.LOG
-rw-------  1 db2inst1 db2iadm1 4202496 Apr  5 16:20 S0000002.LOG
-rw-------  1 db2inst1 db2iadm1 4202496 Apr  5 16:20 S0000003.LOG
-rw-------  1 db2inst1 db2iadm1 4202496 Apr  5 16:20 S0000004.LOG
-rw-------  1 db2inst1 db2iadm1 4202496 Apr  5 16:20 S0000005.LOG
-rw-------  1 db2inst1 db2iadm1 4202496 Apr  5 16:20 S0000006.LOG
-rw-------  1 db2inst1 db2iadm1 4202496 Apr  5 16:20 S0000007.LOG
-rw-------  1 db2inst1 db2iadm1 4202496 Apr  5 16:20 S0000008.LOG
-rw-------  1 db2inst1 db2iadm1 4202496 Apr  5 16:20 S0000009.LOG
-rw-------  1 db2inst1 db2iadm1 4202496 Apr  5 16:20 S0000010.LOG
-rw-------  1 db2inst1 db2iadm1 4202496 Apr  5 16:20 S0000011.LOG
-rw-------  1 db2inst1 db2iadm1 4202496 Apr  5 16:20 S0000012.LOG

修改cfg参数(改为归档模式)

[db2inst1@xifenfei ~]$ db2 update db cfg for xff using LOGPRIMARY 6
DB20000I  The UPDATE DATABASE CONFIGURATION command completed successfully.
[db2inst1@xifenfei ~]$ mkdir -p  xff/redolog
[db2inst1@xifenfei ~]$ mkdir -p  xff/archivelog
[db2inst1@xifenfei ~]$ db2 update db cfg for xff using NEWLOGPATH /home/db2inst1/xff/redolog
DB20000I  The UPDATE DATABASE CONFIGURATION command completed successfully.
[db2inst1@xifenfei ~]$ db2 update db cfg for xff using LOGARCHMETH1 disk:/home/db2inst1/xff/archivelog
DB20000I  The UPDATE DATABASE CONFIGURATION command completed successfully.

查看修改后参数

[db2inst1@xifenfei ~]$ db2 get db cfg for xff|grep -i log
 Log retain for recovery status                          = NO
 User exit for logging status                            = NO   --没有生效
 Catalog cache size (4KB)              (CATALOGCACHE_SZ) = 260
 Log buffer size (4KB)                        (LOGBUFSZ) = 98
 Log file size (4KB)                         (LOGFILSIZ) = 1024
 Number of primary log files                (LOGPRIMARY) = 6
 Number of secondary log files               (LOGSECOND) = 4
 Changed path to log files                  (NEWLOGPATH) = /home/db2inst1/xff/redolog/NODE0000/
 Path to log files                                       = /home/db2inst1/db2inst1/NODE0000/SQL00003/SQLOGDIR/
 Overflow log path                     (OVERFLOWLOGPATH) =
 Mirror log path                         (MIRRORLOGPATH) =
 First active log file                                   =
 Block log on disk full                (BLK_LOG_DSK_FUL) = NO
 Block non logged operations            (BLOCKNONLOGGED) = NO
 Percent max primary log space by transaction  (MAX_LOG) = 0
 Num. of active log files for 1 active UOW(NUM_LOG_SPAN) = 0
 Percent log file reclaimed before soft chckpt (SOFTMAX) = 520
 Log retain for recovery enabled             (LOGRETAIN) = OFF
 User exit for logging enabled                (USEREXIT) = OFF
 HADR log write synchronization mode     (HADR_SYNCMODE) = NEARSYNC
 First log archive method                 (LOGARCHMETH1) = DISK:/home/db2inst1/xff/archivelog/
 Options for logarchmeth1                  (LOGARCHOPT1) =
 Second log archive method                (LOGARCHMETH2) = OFF
 Options for logarchmeth2                  (LOGARCHOPT2) =
 Failover log archive path                (FAILARCHPATH) =
 Number of log archive retries on error   (NUMARCHRETRY) = 5
 Log archive retry Delay (secs)         (ARCHRETRYDELAY) = 20
 Log pages during index build            (LOGINDEXBUILD) = OFF

参数生效情况

[db2inst1@xifenfei ~]$ ll /home/db2inst1/xff/redolog/NODE0000/
total 0
[db2inst1@xifenfei ~]$ db2stop
04/06/2012 05:33:24     0   0   SQL1064N  DB2STOP processing was successful.
SQL1064N  DB2STOP processing was successful.
[db2inst1@xifenfei ~]$ db2start
04/06/2012 05:33:34     0   0   SQL1063N  DB2START processing was successful.
SQL1063N  DB2START processing was successful.
[db2inst1@xifenfei ~]$ ll /home/db2inst1/xff/redolog/NODE0000/
total 0
[db2inst1@xifenfei ~]$ db2 connect to xff
SQL1116N  A connection to or activation of database "XIFENFEI" cannot be made
because of BACKUP PENDING.  SQLSTATE=57019
[db2inst1@xifenfei ~]$ db2 backup db xff to /tmp
Backup successful. The timestamp for this backup image is : 20120406053431
[db2inst1@xifenfei ~]$ ll /home/db2inst1/xff/redolog/NODE0000/
total 24652
-rw-------  1 db2inst1 db2iadm1 4202496 Apr  6 05:33 S0000000.LOG
-rw-------  1 db2inst1 db2iadm1 4202496 Apr  6 05:33 S0000001.LOG
-rw-------  1 db2inst1 db2iadm1 4202496 Apr  6 05:33 S0000002.LOG
-rw-------  1 db2inst1 db2iadm1 4202496 Apr  6 05:33 S0000003.LOG
-rw-------  1 db2inst1 db2iadm1 4202496 Apr  6 05:33 S0000004.LOG
-rw-------  1 db2inst1 db2iadm1 4202496 Apr  6 05:33 S0000005.LOG
-rw-------  1 db2inst1 db2iadm1     512 Apr  6 05:33 SQLLPATH.TAG
[db2inst1@xifenfei ~]$ db2 connect to xff
   Database Connection Information
 Database server        = DB2/LINUX 9.5.9
 SQL authorization ID   = DB2INST1
 Local database alias   = XFF
[db2inst1@xifenfei ~]$ db2 get db cfg for xff|grep -i log
 Log retain for recovery status                          = NO
 User exit for logging status                            = YES
 Catalog cache size (4KB)              (CATALOGCACHE_SZ) = 260
 Log buffer size (4KB)                        (LOGBUFSZ) = 98
 Log file size (4KB)                         (LOGFILSIZ) = 1024
 Number of primary log files                (LOGPRIMARY) = 6
 Number of secondary log files               (LOGSECOND) = 4
 Changed path to log files                  (NEWLOGPATH) =
 Path to log files                                       = /home/db2inst1/xff/redolog/NODE0000/
 Overflow log path                     (OVERFLOWLOGPATH) =
 Mirror log path                         (MIRRORLOGPATH) =
 First active log file                                   = S0000005.LOG
 Block log on disk full                (BLK_LOG_DSK_FUL) = NO
 Block non logged operations            (BLOCKNONLOGGED) = NO
 Percent max primary log space by transaction  (MAX_LOG) = 0
 Num. of active log files for 1 active UOW(NUM_LOG_SPAN) = 0
 Percent log file reclaimed before soft chckpt (SOFTMAX) = 520
 Log retain for recovery enabled             (LOGRETAIN) = OFF
 User exit for logging enabled                (USEREXIT) = OFF
 HADR log write synchronization mode     (HADR_SYNCMODE) = NEARSYNC
 First log archive method                 (LOGARCHMETH1) = DISK:/home/db2inst1/xff/archivelog/
 Options for logarchmeth1                  (LOGARCHOPT1) =
 Second log archive method                (LOGARCHMETH2) = OFF
 Options for logarchmeth2                  (LOGARCHOPT2) =
 Failover log archive path                (FAILARCHPATH) =
 Number of log archive retries on error   (NUMARCHRETRY) = 5
 Log archive retry Delay (secs)         (ARCHRETRYDELAY) = 20
 Log pages during index build            (LOGINDEXBUILD) = OFF

修改备份模式参数需要重启并且备份库后生效

测试归档日志

[db2inst1@xifenfei ~]$ db2 list history archive log  all for xff
                    List History File for xff
Number of matching file entries = 0
[db2inst1@xifenfei ~]$ db2 "create table t_xifenfei like syscat.tables"
DB20000I  The SQL command completed successfully.
[db2inst1@xifenfei ~]$ db2 "insert into t_xifenfei select * from syscat.tables"
DB20000I  The SQL command completed successfully.
[db2inst1@xifenfei ~]$ db2 "insert into t_xifenfei select * from t_xifenfei"
DB20000I  The SQL command completed successfully.
……N次……
[db2inst1@xifenfei ~]$ db2 "select count(*) from t_xifenfei"
1
-----------
      94208
  1 record(s) selected.
[db2inst1@xifenfei ~]$ db2 list history archive log  all for xff
                    List History File for xff
Number of matching file entries = 11
 Op Obj Timestamp+Sequence Type Dev Earliest Log Current Log  Backup ID
 -- --- ------------------ ---- --- ------------ ------------ --------------
  X  D  20120406054854      1    D  S0000000.LOG C0000000
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Comment:
 Start Time: 20120406054854
   End Time: 20120406055029
     Status: A
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  EID: 2 Location: /home/db2inst1/xff/archivelog/db2inst1/XIFENFEI/NODE0000/C0000000/S0000000.LOG
……省略……
 Op Obj Timestamp+Sequence Type Dev Earliest Log Current Log  Backup ID
 -- --- ------------------ ---- --- ------------ ------------ --------------
  X  D  20120406055041      P    D  S0000010.LOG C0000000
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Comment:
 Start Time: 20120406055041
   End Time:
     Status: A
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  EID: 14 Location: /home/db2inst1/xff/redolog/NODE0000/S0000010.LOG
[db2inst1@xifenfei ~]$ ll /home/db2inst1/xff/archivelog/db2inst1/XIFENFEI/NODE0000/C0000000
total 41080
-rw-r-----  1 db2inst1 db2iadm1 4202496 Apr  6 05:50 S0000000.LOG
-rw-r-----  1 db2inst1 db2iadm1 4202496 Apr  6 05:50 S0000001.LOG
-rw-r-----  1 db2inst1 db2iadm1 4202496 Apr  6 05:50 S0000002.LOG
-rw-r-----  1 db2inst1 db2iadm1 4202496 Apr  6 05:50 S0000003.LOG
-rw-r-----  1 db2inst1 db2iadm1 4202496 Apr  6 05:50 S0000004.LOG
-rw-r-----  1 db2inst1 db2iadm1 4202496 Apr  6 05:50 S0000005.LOG
-rw-r-----  1 db2inst1 db2iadm1 4202496 Apr  6 05:50 S0000006.LOG
-rw-r-----  1 db2inst1 db2iadm1 4202496 Apr  6 05:50 S0000007.LOG
-rw-r-----  1 db2inst1 db2iadm1 4202496 Apr  6 05:50 S0000008.LOG
-rw-r-----  1 db2inst1 db2iadm1 4202496 Apr  6 05:50 S0000009.LOG
[db2inst1@xifenfei ~]$ ll /home/db2inst1/xff/redolog/NODE0000
total 32868
-rw-------  1 db2inst1 db2iadm1 4202496 Apr  6 05:50 S0000005.LOG
-rw-------  1 db2inst1 db2iadm1 4202496 Apr  6 05:50 S0000006.LOG
-rw-------  1 db2inst1 db2iadm1 4202496 Apr  6 05:50 S0000007.LOG
-rw-------  1 db2inst1 db2iadm1 4202496 Apr  6 05:50 S0000008.LOG
-rw-------  1 db2inst1 db2iadm1 4202496 Apr  6 05:50 S0000009.LOG
-rw-------  1 db2inst1 db2iadm1 4202496 Apr  6 05:50 S0000010.LOG
-rw-------  1 db2inst1 db2iadm1 4202496 Apr  6 05:50 S0000011.LOG
-rw-------  1 db2inst1 db2iadm1 4202496 Apr  6 05:50 S0000012.LOG
-rw-------  1 db2inst1 db2iadm1     512 Apr  6 05:33 SQLLPATH.TAG

手工修复ASM DISK HEADER 异常

今天有网友对asm中的磁盘做了fdisk操作,导致asm disk异常,通过手工修复ASM DISK HEADER 解决该问题,这里通过实验重现,提醒大家操作asm中的硬盘分区需要慎重,平时对ASM DISK HEADER 做好备份
初始化信息

SQL> select * from v$version;
BANNER
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.3.0 - Production
PL/SQL Release 11.2.0.3.0 - Production
CORE    11.2.0.3.0      Production
TNS for Linux: Version 11.2.0.3.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 11.2.0.3.0 - Production
SQL>  show parameter instance_name;
NAME                                 TYPE       VALUE
------------------------------------ ---------- ----------------
instance_name                        string     +ASM1
SQL> select group_number,DISK_NUMBER,PATH,HEADER_STATUS from v$asm_disk ;
GROUP_NUMBER DISK_NUMBER PATH                           HEADER_STATUS
------------ ----------- ------------------------------ ------------------------
           1           1 /dev/oracleasm/disks/VOL2      MEMBER
           1           0 /dev/oracleasm/disks/VOL1      MEMBER
           2           1 /dev/oracleasm/disks/VOL4      MEMBER
           2           0 /dev/oracleasm/disks/VOL3      MEMBER
[grid@rac1 ~]$ /etc/init.d/oracleasm  querydisk -d VOL3
Disk "VOL3" is a valid ASM disk on device [8,17]
[grid@rac1 ~]$ ll /dev |grep 8,|grep 17
brw-r----- 1 root disk     8,  17 Apr 17 11:37 sdb1
[grid@rac1 ~]$ /etc/init.d/oracleasm  querydisk -d VOL4
Disk "VOL4" is a valid ASM disk on device [8,18]
[grid@rac1 ~]$ ll /dev |grep 8,|grep 18
brw-r----- 1 root disk     8,  18 Apr 17 11:37 sdb2

备份ASM DISK HEADER

[root@rac1 backup_asmheader]# dd if=/dev/sdb1 of=vol3header.dd bs=4096 count=1
1+0 records in
1+0 records out
4096 bytes (4.1 kB) copied, 0.000143581 seconds, 28.5 MB/s
[root@rac1 backup_asmheader]# dd if=/dev/sdb2 of=vol4header.dd bs=4096 count=1
1+0 records in
1+0 records out
4096 bytes (4.1 kB) copied, 0.000147727 seconds, 27.7 MB/s

破坏ASM DISK HEADER

[root@rac1 ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdb1 bs=4096 count=1
1+0 records in
1+0 records out
4096 bytes (4.1 kB) copied, 4.4421e-05 seconds, 92.2 MB/s
[grid@rac1 ~]$ kfed read /dev/oracleasm/disks/VOL3
kfbh.endian:                          0 ; 0x000: 0x00
kfbh.hard:                            0 ; 0x001: 0x00
kfbh.type:                            0 ; 0x002: KFBTYP_INVALID
kfbh.datfmt:                          0 ; 0x003: 0x00
kfbh.block.blk:                       0 ; 0x004: blk=0
kfbh.block.obj:                       0 ; 0x008: file=0
kfbh.check:                           0 ; 0x00c: 0x00000000
kfbh.fcn.base:                        0 ; 0x010: 0x00000000
kfbh.fcn.wrap:                        0 ; 0x014: 0x00000000
kfbh.spare1:                          0 ; 0x018: 0x00000000
kfbh.spare2:                          0 ; 0x01c: 0x00000000
B4C83200 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000  [................]
  Repeat 255 times
KFED-00322: Invalid content encountered during block traversal: [kfbtTraverseBlock][Invalid OSM block type][][0]
SQL> select group_number,DISK_NUMBER,PATH,HEADER_STATUS from v$asm_disk ;
GROUP_NUMBER DISK_NUMBER PATH                           HEADER_STATUS
------------ ----------- ------------------------------ ------------------------
           1           1 /dev/oracleasm/disks/VOL2      MEMBER
           1           0 /dev/oracleasm/disks/VOL1      MEMBER
           2           1 /dev/oracleasm/disks/VOL4      MEMBER
           2           0 /dev/oracleasm/disks/VOL3      CANDIDATE

remount diskgroup

SQL> alter diskgroup  xifenfei dismount;
Diskgroup altered.
SQL> alter diskgroup xifenfei mount;
alter diskgroup xifenfei mount
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-15032: not all alterations performed
ORA-15017: diskgroup "XIFENFEI" cannot be mounted
ORA-15063: ASM discovered an insufficient number of disks for diskgroup
"XIFENFEI"

查看同一DISKGROUP中其他磁盘kfed

[grid@rac1 ~]$ kfed read /dev/oracleasm/disks/VOL4
kfbh.endian:                          1 ; 0x000: 0x01
kfbh.hard:                          130 ; 0x001: 0x82
kfbh.type:                            1 ; 0x002: KFBTYP_DISKHEAD
kfbh.datfmt:                          1 ; 0x003: 0x01
kfbh.block.blk:                       0 ; 0x004: blk=0
kfbh.block.obj:              2147483649 ; 0x008: disk=1
kfbh.check:                   349717291 ; 0x00c: 0x14d8432b
kfbh.fcn.base:                        0 ; 0x010: 0x00000000
kfbh.fcn.wrap:                        0 ; 0x014: 0x00000000
kfbh.spare1:                          0 ; 0x018: 0x00000000
kfbh.spare2:                          0 ; 0x01c: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.driver.provstr:     ORCLDISKVOL4 ; 0x000: length=12
kfdhdb.driver.reserved[0]:    877416278 ; 0x008: 0x344c4f56
kfdhdb.driver.reserved[1]:            0 ; 0x00c: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.driver.reserved[2]:            0 ; 0x010: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.driver.reserved[3]:            0 ; 0x014: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.driver.reserved[4]:            0 ; 0x018: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.driver.reserved[5]:            0 ; 0x01c: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.compat:                186646528 ; 0x020: 0x0b200000
kfdhdb.dsknum:                        1 ; 0x024: 0x0001
kfdhdb.grptyp:                        1 ; 0x026: KFDGTP_EXTERNAL
kfdhdb.hdrsts:                        3 ; 0x027: KFDHDR_MEMBER
kfdhdb.dskname:           XIFENFEI_0001 ; 0x028: length=13
kfdhdb.grpname:                XIFENFEI ; 0x048: length=8
kfdhdb.fgname:            XIFENFEI_0001 ; 0x068: length=13
kfdhdb.capname:                         ; 0x088: length=0
kfdhdb.crestmp.hi:             32967790 ; 0x0a8: HOUR=0xe DAYS=0x3 MNTH=0x3 YEAR=0x7dc
kfdhdb.crestmp.lo:           2015933440 ; 0x0ac: USEC=0x0 MSEC=0x22d SECS=0x2 MINS=0x1e
kfdhdb.mntstmp.hi:             32969260 ; 0x0b0: HOUR=0xc DAYS=0x11 MNTH=0x4 YEAR=0x7dc
kfdhdb.mntstmp.lo:           3109835776 ; 0x0b4: USEC=0x0 MSEC=0x315 SECS=0x15 MINS=0x2e
kfdhdb.secsize:                     512 ; 0x0b8: 0x0200
kfdhdb.blksize:                    4096 ; 0x0ba: 0x1000
kfdhdb.ausize:                  1048576 ; 0x0bc: 0x00100000
kfdhdb.mfact:                    113792 ; 0x0c0: 0x0001bc80
kfdhdb.dsksize:                    3788 ; 0x0c4: 0x00000ecc
kfdhdb.pmcnt:                         2 ; 0x0c8: 0x00000002
kfdhdb.fstlocn:                       1 ; 0x0cc: 0x00000001
kfdhdb.altlocn:                       2 ; 0x0d0: 0x00000002
kfdhdb.f1b1locn:                      0 ; 0x0d4: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.redomirrors[0]:                0 ; 0x0d8: 0x0000
kfdhdb.redomirrors[1]:                0 ; 0x0da: 0x0000
kfdhdb.redomirrors[2]:                0 ; 0x0dc: 0x0000
kfdhdb.redomirrors[3]:                0 ; 0x0de: 0x0000
kfdhdb.dbcompat:              168820736 ; 0x0e0: 0x0a100000
kfdhdb.grpstmp.hi:             32967790 ; 0x0e4: HOUR=0xe DAYS=0x3 MNTH=0x3 YEAR=0x7dc
kfdhdb.grpstmp.lo:           2015746048 ; 0x0e8: USEC=0x0 MSEC=0x176 SECS=0x2 MINS=0x1e
kfdhdb.vfstart:                       0 ; 0x0ec: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.vfend:                         0 ; 0x0f0: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.spfile:                        0 ; 0x0f4: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.spfflg:                        0 ; 0x0f8: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[0]:                   0 ; 0x0fc: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[1]:                   0 ; 0x100: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[2]:                   0 ; 0x104: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[3]:                   0 ; 0x108: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[4]:                   0 ; 0x10c: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[5]:                   0 ; 0x110: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[6]:                   0 ; 0x114: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[7]:                   0 ; 0x118: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[8]:                   0 ; 0x11c: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[9]:                   0 ; 0x120: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[10]:                  0 ; 0x124: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[11]:                  0 ; 0x128: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[12]:                  0 ; 0x12c: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[13]:                  0 ; 0x130: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[14]:                  0 ; 0x134: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[15]:                  0 ; 0x138: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[16]:                  0 ; 0x13c: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[17]:                  0 ; 0x140: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[18]:                  0 ; 0x144: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[19]:                  0 ; 0x148: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[20]:                  0 ; 0x14c: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[21]:                  0 ; 0x150: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[22]:                  0 ; 0x154: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[23]:                  0 ; 0x158: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[24]:                  0 ; 0x15c: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[25]:                  0 ; 0x160: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[26]:                  0 ; 0x164: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[27]:                  0 ; 0x168: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[28]:                  0 ; 0x16c: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[29]:                  0 ; 0x170: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[30]:                  0 ; 0x174: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[31]:                  0 ; 0x178: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[32]:                  0 ; 0x17c: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[33]:                  0 ; 0x180: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[34]:                  0 ; 0x184: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[35]:                  0 ; 0x188: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[36]:                  0 ; 0x18c: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[37]:                  0 ; 0x190: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[38]:                  0 ; 0x194: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[39]:                  0 ; 0x198: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[40]:                  0 ; 0x19c: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[41]:                  0 ; 0x1a0: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[42]:                  0 ; 0x1a4: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[43]:                  0 ; 0x1a8: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[44]:                  0 ; 0x1ac: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[45]:                  0 ; 0x1b0: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[46]:                  0 ; 0x1b4: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[47]:                  0 ; 0x1b8: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[48]:                  0 ; 0x1bc: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[49]:                  0 ; 0x1c0: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[50]:                  0 ; 0x1c4: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[51]:                  0 ; 0x1c8: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[52]:                  0 ; 0x1cc: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[53]:                  0 ; 0x1d0: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.acdb.aba.seq:                  0 ; 0x1d4: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.acdb.aba.blk:                  0 ; 0x1d8: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.acdb.ents:                     0 ; 0x1dc: 0x0000
kfdhdb.acdb.ub2spare:                 0 ; 0x1de: 0x0000

通过VOL4 kfed修改出VOL3 kfed

[grid@rac1 ~]$ cat vol3.txt
kfbh.endian:                          1 ; 0x000: 0x01
kfbh.hard:                          130 ; 0x001: 0x82
kfbh.type:                            1 ; 0x002: KFBTYP_DISKHEAD
kfbh.datfmt:                          1 ; 0x003: 0x01
kfbh.block.blk:                       0 ; 0x004: blk=0
*kfbh.block.obj:              2147483648 ; 0x008: disk=0
kfbh.check:                   332940500 ; 0x00c: 0x13d844d4
kfbh.fcn.base:                        0 ; 0x010: 0x00000000
kfbh.fcn.wrap:                        0 ; 0x014: 0x00000000
kfbh.spare1:                          0 ; 0x018: 0x00000000
kfbh.spare2:                          0 ; 0x01c: 0x00000000
*kfdhdb.driver.provstr:     ORCLDISKVOL3 ; 0x000: length=12
*kfdhdb.driver.reserved[0]:    860639062 ; 0x008: 0x334c4f56
kfdhdb.driver.reserved[1]:            0 ; 0x00c: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.driver.reserved[2]:            0 ; 0x010: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.driver.reserved[3]:            0 ; 0x014: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.driver.reserved[4]:            0 ; 0x018: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.driver.reserved[5]:            0 ; 0x01c: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.compat:                186646528 ; 0x020: 0x0b200000
*kfdhdb.dsknum:                        0 ; 0x024: 0x0000
kfdhdb.grptyp:                        1 ; 0x026: KFDGTP_EXTERNAL
kfdhdb.hdrsts:                        3 ; 0x027: KFDHDR_MEMBER
*kfdhdb.dskname:           XIFENFEI_0000 ; 0x028: length=13
kfdhdb.grpname:                XIFENFEI ; 0x048: length=8
*kfdhdb.fgname:            XIFENFEI_0000 ; 0x068: length=13
kfdhdb.capname:                         ; 0x088: length=0
kfdhdb.crestmp.hi:             32967790 ; 0x0a8: HOUR=0xe DAYS=0x3 MNTH=0x3 YEAR=0x7dc
kfdhdb.crestmp.lo:           2015933440 ; 0x0ac: USEC=0x0 MSEC=0x22d SECS=0x2 MINS=0x1e
kfdhdb.mntstmp.hi:             32969260 ; 0x0b0: HOUR=0xc DAYS=0x11 MNTH=0x4 YEAR=0x7dc
kfdhdb.mntstmp.lo:           3109835776 ; 0x0b4: USEC=0x0 MSEC=0x315 SECS=0x15 MINS=0x2e
kfdhdb.secsize:                     512 ; 0x0b8: 0x0200
kfdhdb.blksize:                    4096 ; 0x0ba: 0x1000
kfdhdb.ausize:                  1048576 ; 0x0bc: 0x00100000
kfdhdb.mfact:                    113792 ; 0x0c0: 0x0001bc80
*kfdhdb.dsksize:                    2353 ; 0x0c4: 0x00000931
kfdhdb.pmcnt:                         2 ; 0x0c8: 0x00000002
kfdhdb.fstlocn:                       1 ; 0x0cc: 0x00000001
kfdhdb.altlocn:                       2 ; 0x0d0: 0x00000002
*kfdhdb.f1b1locn:                      2 ; 0x0d4: 0x00000002
kfdhdb.redomirrors[0]:                0 ; 0x0d8: 0x0000
kfdhdb.redomirrors[1]:                0 ; 0x0da: 0x0000
kfdhdb.redomirrors[2]:                0 ; 0x0dc: 0x0000
kfdhdb.redomirrors[3]:                0 ; 0x0de: 0x0000
kfdhdb.dbcompat:              168820736 ; 0x0e0: 0x0a100000
kfdhdb.grpstmp.hi:             32967790 ; 0x0e4: HOUR=0xe DAYS=0x3 MNTH=0x3 YEAR=0x7dc
kfdhdb.grpstmp.lo:           2015746048 ; 0x0e8: USEC=0x0 MSEC=0x176 SECS=0x2 MINS=0x1e
kfdhdb.vfstart:                       0 ; 0x0ec: 0x00000000

后续处理

--导入kfed
[grid@rac1 ~]$ kfed merge /dev/oracleasm/disks/VOL3 text=vol3.txt
--MOUNT diskgroup
SQL> alter diskgroup xifenfei mount;
Diskgroup altered.

如果您遇到此类情况,无法解决请联系我们,提供专业ORACLE数据库恢复技术支持
Phone:17813235971    Q Q:107644445QQ咨询惜分飞    E-Mail:dba@xifenfei.com

ASM DISK HEADER 备份与恢复

最近遇到几次ASM DATA HEADER出问题导致DISK GROUP 不能正常的MOUNT,是的数据库不能正常工作,从来带来了无穷的麻烦,这个时候心想,如果我做了ASM DATA HEADER的备份该多好啊,可惜世上没有后悔药,建议大家检查下自己的ASM库,ASM HEADER是否已经做了备份,如果没有请及时处理下.这里试验提供了dd和kfed备份和恢复ASM HEADER
查询ASM相关信息

SQL> select group_number,name,state,total_mb,free_mb from v$asm_diskgroup;
GROUP_NUMBER NAME                           STATE        TOTAL_MB    FREE_MB
------------ ------------------------------ ---------- ---------- ----------
           1 DATA                           MOUNTED          2046       1314
           2 XIFENFEI                       MOUNTED          6141       4378
SQL> select group_number,DISK_NUMBER,PATH,STATE from v$asm_disk;
GROUP_NUMBER DISK_NUMBER PATH                           STATE
------------ ----------- ------------------------------ ----------------
           1           1 /dev/oracleasm/disks/VOL2      NORMAL
           1           0 /dev/oracleasm/disks/VOL1      NORMAL
           2           1 /dev/oracleasm/disks/VOL4      NORMAL
           2           0 /dev/oracleasm/disks/VOL3      NORMAL

找出ASM DISK对应磁盘分区

[grid@rac1 ~]$ /etc/init.d/oracleasm  querydisk -d VOL1
Disk "VOL1" is a valid ASM disk on device [8,33]
[grid@rac1 ~]$ ll /dev |grep 8|grep 33
brw-r----- 1 root disk     8,  33 Apr 17 11:37 sdc1
[grid@rac1 ~]$ /etc/init.d/oracleasm  querydisk -d VOL2
Disk "VOL2" is a valid ASM disk on device [8,34]
[grid@rac1 ~]$ ll /dev |grep 8|grep 34
brw-r----- 1 root disk     8,  34 Apr 17 11:37 sdc2
[grid@rac1 ~]$ /etc/init.d/oracleasm  querydisk -d VOL3
Disk "VOL3" is a valid ASM disk on device [8,17]
[grid@rac1 ~]$ ll /dev |grep 8,|grep 17
brw-r----- 1 root disk     8,  17 Apr 17 11:37 sdb1
[grid@rac1 ~]$ /etc/init.d/oracleasm  querydisk -d VOL4
Disk "VOL4" is a valid ASM disk on device [8,18]
[grid@rac1 ~]$ ll /dev |grep 8,|grep 18
brw-r----- 1 root disk     8,  18 Apr 17 11:37 sdb2

备份ASM HEADER信息(备份XIFENFEI磁盘组)

--dd方式备份
[root@rac1 backup_asmheader]# dd if=/dev/sdb1 of=vol3header.dd bs=4096 count=1
1+0 records in
1+0 records out
4096 bytes (4.1 kB) copied, 0.000143581 seconds, 28.5 MB/s
[root@rac1 backup_asmheader]# dd if=/dev/sdb2 of=vol4header.dd bs=4096 count=1
1+0 records in
1+0 records out
4096 bytes (4.1 kB) copied, 0.000147727 seconds, 27.7 MB/s
--kfed方式备份
[grid@rac1 backup_asmheader]$ kfed read /dev/oracleasm/disks/VOL3 text=vol3header.txt
[grid@rac1 backup_asmheader]$ more vol3header.txt
kfbh.endian:                          1 ; 0x000: 0x01
kfbh.hard:                          130 ; 0x001: 0x82
kfbh.type:                            1 ; 0x002: KFBTYP_DISKHEAD
kfbh.datfmt:                          1 ; 0x003: 0x01
kfbh.block.blk:                       0 ; 0x004: blk=0
kfbh.block.obj:              2147483648 ; 0x008: disk=0
kfbh.check:                   198826195 ; 0x00c: 0x0bd9d8d3
kfbh.fcn.base:                        0 ; 0x010: 0x00000000
kfbh.fcn.wrap:                        0 ; 0x014: 0x00000000
kfbh.spare1:                          0 ; 0x018: 0x00000000
kfbh.spare2:                          0 ; 0x01c: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.driver.provstr:     ORCLDISKVOL3 ; 0x000: length=12
kfdhdb.driver.reserved[0]:    860639062 ; 0x008: 0x334c4f56
kfdhdb.driver.reserved[1]:            0 ; 0x00c: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.driver.reserved[2]:            0 ; 0x010: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.driver.reserved[3]:            0 ; 0x014: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.driver.reserved[4]:            0 ; 0x018: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.driver.reserved[5]:            0 ; 0x01c: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.compat:                186646528 ; 0x020: 0x0b200000
kfdhdb.dsknum:                        0 ; 0x024: 0x0000
kfdhdb.grptyp:                        1 ; 0x026: KFDGTP_EXTERNAL
kfdhdb.hdrsts:                        3 ; 0x027: KFDHDR_MEMBER
kfdhdb.dskname:           XIFENFEI_0000 ; 0x028: length=13
kfdhdb.grpname:                XIFENFEI ; 0x048: length=8
kfdhdb.fgname:            XIFENFEI_0000 ; 0x068: length=13
kfdhdb.capname:                         ; 0x088: length=0
kfdhdb.crestmp.hi:             32967790 ; 0x0a8: HOUR=0xe DAYS=0x3 MNTH=0x3 YEAR=0x7dc
kfdhdb.crestmp.lo:           2015933440 ; 0x0ac: USEC=0x0 MSEC=0x22d SECS=0x2 MINS=0x1e
kfdhdb.mntstmp.hi:             32969259 ; 0x0b0: HOUR=0xb DAYS=0x11 MNTH=0x4 YEAR=0x7dc
kfdhdb.mntstmp.lo:           2707277824 ; 0x0b4: USEC=0x0 MSEC=0x372 SECS=0x15 MINS=0x28
kfdhdb.secsize:                     512 ; 0x0b8: 0x0200
kfdhdb.blksize:                    4096 ; 0x0ba: 0x1000
kfdhdb.ausize:                  1048576 ; 0x0bc: 0x00100000
kfdhdb.mfact:                    113792 ; 0x0c0: 0x0001bc80
kfdhdb.dsksize:                    2353 ; 0x0c4: 0x00000931
kfdhdb.pmcnt:                         2 ; 0x0c8: 0x00000002
kfdhdb.fstlocn:                       1 ; 0x0cc: 0x00000001
kfdhdb.altlocn:                       2 ; 0x0d0: 0x00000002
kfdhdb.f1b1locn:                      2 ; 0x0d4: 0x00000002
kfdhdb.redomirrors[0]:                0 ; 0x0d8: 0x0000
kfdhdb.redomirrors[1]:                0 ; 0x0da: 0x0000
kfdhdb.redomirrors[2]:                0 ; 0x0dc: 0x0000
kfdhdb.redomirrors[3]:                0 ; 0x0de: 0x0000
kfdhdb.dbcompat:              168820736 ; 0x0e0: 0x0a100000
kfdhdb.grpstmp.hi:             32967790 ; 0x0e4: HOUR=0xe DAYS=0x3 MNTH=0x3 YEAR=0x7dc
kfdhdb.grpstmp.lo:           2015746048 ; 0x0e8: USEC=0x0 MSEC=0x176 SECS=0x2 MINS=0x1e
kfdhdb.vfstart:                       0 ; 0x0ec: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.vfend:                         0 ; 0x0f0: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.spfile:                        0 ; 0x0f4: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.spfflg:                        0 ; 0x0f8: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[0]:                   0 ; 0x0fc: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[1]:                   0 ; 0x100: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[2]:                   0 ; 0x104: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[3]:                   0 ; 0x108: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[4]:                   0 ; 0x10c: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[5]:                   0 ; 0x110: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[6]:                   0 ; 0x114: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[7]:                   0 ; 0x118: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[8]:                   0 ; 0x11c: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[9]:                   0 ; 0x120: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[10]:                  0 ; 0x124: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[11]:                  0 ; 0x128: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[12]:                  0 ; 0x12c: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[13]:                  0 ; 0x130: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[14]:                  0 ; 0x134: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[15]:                  0 ; 0x138: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[16]:                  0 ; 0x13c: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[17]:                  0 ; 0x140: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[18]:                  0 ; 0x144: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[19]:                  0 ; 0x148: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[20]:                  0 ; 0x14c: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[21]:                  0 ; 0x150: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[22]:                  0 ; 0x154: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[23]:                  0 ; 0x158: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[24]:                  0 ; 0x15c: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[25]:                  0 ; 0x160: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[26]:                  0 ; 0x164: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[27]:                  0 ; 0x168: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[28]:                  0 ; 0x16c: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[29]:                  0 ; 0x170: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[30]:                  0 ; 0x174: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[31]:                  0 ; 0x178: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[32]:                  0 ; 0x17c: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[33]:                  0 ; 0x180: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[34]:                  0 ; 0x184: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[35]:                  0 ; 0x188: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[36]:                  0 ; 0x18c: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[37]:                  0 ; 0x190: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[38]:                  0 ; 0x194: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[39]:                  0 ; 0x198: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[40]:                  0 ; 0x19c: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[41]:                  0 ; 0x1a0: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[42]:                  0 ; 0x1a4: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[43]:                  0 ; 0x1a8: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[44]:                  0 ; 0x1ac: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[45]:                  0 ; 0x1b0: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[46]:                  0 ; 0x1b4: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[47]:                  0 ; 0x1b8: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[48]:                  0 ; 0x1bc: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[49]:                  0 ; 0x1c0: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[50]:                  0 ; 0x1c4: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[51]:                  0 ; 0x1c8: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[52]:                  0 ; 0x1cc: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.ub4spare[53]:                  0 ; 0x1d0: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.acdb.aba.seq:                  0 ; 0x1d4: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.acdb.aba.blk:                  0 ; 0x1d8: 0x00000000
kfdhdb.acdb.ents:                     0 ; 0x1dc: 0x0000
kfdhdb.acdb.ub2spare:                 0 ; 0x1de: 0x0000
[grid@rac1 backup_asmheader]$ kfed read /dev/oracleasm/disks/VOL4 text=vol4header.txt

破坏VOL3 ASM磁盘

[root@rac1 backup_asmheader]# dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdb1 bs=4096 count=1
1+0 records in
1+0 records out
4096 bytes (4.1 kB) copied, 0.00165264 seconds, 2.5 MB/s
[grid@rac1 backup_asmheader]$ kfed read /dev/oracleasm/disks/VOL3
kfbh.endian:                          0 ; 0x000: 0x00
kfbh.hard:                            0 ; 0x001: 0x00
kfbh.type:                            0 ; 0x002: KFBTYP_INVALID
kfbh.datfmt:                          0 ; 0x003: 0x00
kfbh.block.blk:                       0 ; 0x004: blk=0
kfbh.block.obj:                       0 ; 0x008: file=0
kfbh.check:                           0 ; 0x00c: 0x00000000
kfbh.fcn.base:                        0 ; 0x010: 0x00000000
kfbh.fcn.wrap:                        0 ; 0x014: 0x00000000
kfbh.spare1:                          0 ; 0x018: 0x00000000
kfbh.spare2:                          0 ; 0x01c: 0x00000000
B4BFE200 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000  [................]
  Repeat 255 times
KFED-00322: Invalid content encountered during block traversal: [kfbtTraverseBlock][Invalid OSM block type][][0]

启动ASM

[grid@rac1 backup_asmheader]$ sqlplus / as sysoper
SQL*Plus: Release 11.2.0.3.0 Production on Tue Apr 17 12:29:42 2012
Copyright (c) 1982, 2011, Oracle.  All rights reserved.
Connected to an idle instance.
SQL> startup
ASM instance started
ORA-15032: not all alterations performed
ORA-15017: diskgroup "XIFENFEI" cannot be mounted
ORA-15063: ASM discovered an insufficient number of disks for diskgroup
"XIFENFEI"

恢复ASM DATE HEADER

--dd 恢复
[root@rac1 backup_asmheader]# dd if=vol3header.dd of=/dev/sdb1 bs=4096 count=1
1+0 records in
1+0 records out
4096 bytes (4.1 kB) copied, 0.00197913 seconds, 2.1 MB/s
--kfed 恢复
[grid@rac1 backup_asmheader]$ kfed merge /dev/oracleasm/disks/VOL3 text=vol3header.txt

MOUNT DISKGROUP

SQL> alter diskgroup xifenfei mount;
Diskgroup altered.

找出调用DBLINK的SESSION信息

怎么找出通过dblink访问的用户信息?这个问题困惑了很久,今天在朋友的帮助下,终于通过基表实现了这个功能,记录下来

SELECT /*+ ORDERED */
 S.KSUSEMNM "O_HOSTNAME",S.KSUSEPID "O_SPID",--操作dblink用户信息
 G.K2GTITID_ORA "O_TXID",
 S.INDX "S_SID",S.KSUSESER "S_SERIAL#",--dblink session信息
 DECODE(BITAND(KSUSEIDL, 11),
               1,
               'ACTIVE',
               0,
               DECODE(BITAND(KSUSEFLG, 4096), 0, 'INACTIVE', 'CACHED'),
               2,
               'SNIPED',
               3,
               'SNIPED',
               'KILLED') "S_STATUS",
                S.KSUUDNAM "DBLINK_USER"
  FROM SYS.X$K2GTE G, SYS.X$KTCXB T, SYS.X$KSUSE S
 WHERE G.K2GTDXCB = T.KTCXBXBA
   AND G.K2GTDSES = T.KTCXBSES
   AND S.ADDR = G.K2GTDSES;

查询结果如下

O_HOSTNAME             O_SPID       O_TXID                      S_SID  S_SERIAL#  S_STATUS   DBLINK_USER
----------------------- ---------- -----------------------  ---------- ---------- --------  ------------
localhost.localdomain  2571         MCRM.757120d4.8.31.21425     5462         20  INACTIVE   TEST1
localhost.localdomain  1021         MCRM.757120d4.6.17.21298     5467        664  INACTIVE   TEST
localhost.localdomain  1385         MCRM.757120d4.10.2.16138     5473        155  INACTIVE   TEST

如果需要获取更加信息的信息,可以通过结合两端的v$session和v$process视图获得

ORA-01075: you are currently logged on

rm删除文件后alert中出现错误

Mon Apr 16 21:36:59 2012
Errors in file /home/oracle/oracle/admin/XGS/bdump/xgs_j000_1349.trc:
ORA-00603: ORACLE server session terminated by fatal error
ORA-01116: error in opening database file 3
ORA-01110: data file 3: '/home/oracle/oracle/oradata/XGS/sysaux01.dbf'
ORA-27041: unable to open file
Linux Error: 2: No such file or directory
Additional information: 3
ORA-01116: error in opening database file 3
ORA-01110: data file 3: '/home/oracle/oracle/oradata/XGS/sysaux01.dbf'
ORA-27041: unable to open file
Linux Error: 2: No such file or directory
Additional information: 3
ORA-01116: error in opening database file 6
ORA-01110: data file 6: '/home/oracle/oracle/oradata/XGS/undotbs02.dbf'
ORA-27041: unable to open file
Linux Error: 2: No such file or directory
Additional information: 3

数据库进程还在运行

oracle     779     1  0 21:21 ?        00:00:01 ora_pmon_XGS
oracle     781     1  0 21:21 ?        00:00:10 ora_psp0_XGS
oracle     783     1  0 21:21 ?        00:00:00 ora_mman_XGS
oracle     785     1  0 21:21 ?        00:00:00 ora_dbw0_XGS
oracle     787     1  0 21:21 ?        00:00:00 ora_lgwr_XGS
oracle     789     1  0 21:21 ?        00:00:00 ora_ckpt_XGS
oracle     791     1  0 21:21 ?        00:00:00 ora_smon_XGS
oracle     793     1  0 21:21 ?        00:00:00 ora_reco_XGS
oracle     795     1  0 21:21 ?        00:00:00 ora_cjq0_XGS
oracle     797     1  0 21:21 ?        00:00:01 ora_mmon_XGS
oracle     799     1  0 21:21 ?        00:00:00 ora_mmnl_XGS
oracle     801     1  0 21:21 ?        00:00:00 ora_d000_XGS
oracle     803     1  0 21:21 ?        00:00:00 ora_s000_XGS

尝试登陆数据库

[oracle@dbtest ~]$ sqlplus / as sysdba
SQL*Plus: Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Production on Mon Apr 16 21:40:06 2012
Copyright (c) 1982, 2005, Oracle.  All rights reserved.
ERROR:
ORA-01075: you are currently logged on
Enter user-name: sys
Enter password:
ERROR:
ORA-00604: error occurred at recursive SQL level 2
ORA-01116: error in opening database file 1
ORA-01110: data file 1: '/home/oracle/oracle/oradata/XGS/system01.dbf'
ORA-27041: unable to open file
Linux Error: 2: No such file or directory
Additional information: 3
ORA-00604: error occurred at recursive SQL level 1
ORA-01116: error in opening database file 6
ORA-01110: data file 6: '/home/oracle/oracle/oradata/XGS/undotbs02.dbf'
ORA-27041: unable to open file
Linux Error: 2: No such file or directory
Additional information: 3

问题原因

Internal triggers are trying to fire but one or more datafiles for the SYSAUX tablespace is offline,
this is preventing the database from allowing new connections.
NOTE: At this point, you cannot connect to verify the status in V$DATAFILE,
but you may find an indication of the offline datafile(s) in the alert.log file.
For example:
In one case, a media problem occurred which made disks unavailable.
This caused several files to be taken offline automatically including a SYSAUX datafile.

解决方法
kill进程,重启数据库到mount状态,然后根据特定情况恢复数据库或者online相关文件

DB2数据迁移之db2lock/db2move

1.模拟带有identity表

[db2inst1@xifenfei ~]$ db2 "create table t_xff(xid smallint not null generated always as identity
> (start with 1,increment by 1),x_name varchar(200)) in ts_xifenfei"
DB20000I  The SQL command completed successfully.
[db2inst1@xifenfei ~]$ db2 "insert into t_xff(x_name) values('www.xifenfei.com')"
DB20000I  The SQL command completed successfully.
[db2inst1@xifenfei ~]$ db2 "insert into t_xff(x_name) values('XIFENFEI')"
DB20000I  The SQL command completed successfully.
[db2inst1@xifenfei ~]$ db2 "insert into t_xff(x_name) values('xifenfei')"
DB20000I  The SQL command completed successfully.
[db2inst1@xifenfei ~]$ db2 "select * from t_ff"
SQL0204N  "DB2INST1.T_FF" is an undefined name.  SQLSTATE=42704
[db2inst1@xifenfei ~]$ db2 "select * from t_xff"
XID    X_NAME
------ -------------
     1 www.xifenfei.com
     2 XIFENFEI
     3 xifenfei
  3 record(s) selected.

2.导出表结构

[db2inst1@xifenfei ~]$ mkdir move_s
[db2inst1@xifenfei ~]$ cd move_s/
[db2inst1@xifenfei move_s]$ db2look -d sample -e -l -o db2_sample.ddl
-- No userid was specified, db2look tries to use Environment variable USER
-- USER is: DB2INST1
-- Creating DDL for table(s)
-- Output is sent to file: db2_sample.ddl

3.导出数据

[db2inst1@xifenfei move_s]$ db2move sample export
Application code page not determined, using ANSI codepage 1208
*****  DB2MOVE  *****
Action:  EXPORT
Start time:  Thu Apr  5 20:21:28 2012
Connecting to database SAMPLE ... successful!  Server : DB2 Common Server V9.5.9
Binding package automatically ... /home/db2inst1/sqllib/bnd/db2common.bnd ... successful!
Binding package automatically ... /home/db2inst1/sqllib/bnd/db2move.bnd ... successful!
EXPORT:     18 rows from table "DB2INST1"."ACT"
EXPORT:      5 rows from table "DB2INST1"."CL_SCHED"
EXPORT:     14 rows from table "DB2INST1"."DEPARTMENT"
EXPORT:     42 rows from table "DB2INST1"."EMPLOYEE"
EXPORT:  10000 rows from table "DB2INST1"."EMPMDC"
EXPORT:     73 rows from table "DB2INST1"."EMPPROJACT"
EXPORT:      8 rows from table "DB2INST1"."EMP_PHOTO"
EXPORT:      8 rows from table "DB2INST1"."EMP_RESUME"
EXPORT:    145 rows from table "SYSTOOLS"."HMON_ATM_INFO"
EXPORT:      0 rows from table "SYSTOOLS"."HMON_COLLECTION"
EXPORT:      3 rows from table "DB2INST1"."IN_TRAY"
EXPORT:      8 rows from table "DB2INST1"."ORG"
EXPORT:      5 rows from table "SYSTOOLS"."POLICY"
EXPORT:     65 rows from table "DB2INST1"."PROJACT"
EXPORT:     20 rows from table "DB2INST1"."PROJECT"
EXPORT:     41 rows from table "DB2INST1"."SALES"
EXPORT:     35 rows from table "DB2INST1"."STAFF"
EXPORT:     35 rows from table "DB2INST1"."STAFFG"
EXPORT:      3 rows from table "DB2INST1"."T_XFF"
Disconnecting from database ... successful!
End time:  Thu Apr  5 20:21:32 2012

4.目标端创建数据库

C:\Windows\system32>db2 "create db db_XFF pagesize 8 k"
DB20000I  CREATE DATABASE命令成功完成。

5.目标端创建对象

C:\Windows\system32>DB2 -tvf D:\move_s\db2_sample.ddl -l d:\xifenfei.log
--检查xifenfei.log文件,发现错误,手工修复

6.导入数据文件

D:\move_s>db2move db_xff load
*****  DB2MOVE  *****
Action:  LOAD
Start time:  Sun Apr 15 23:00:17 2012
Connecting to database DB_XFF ... successful!  Server : DB2 Common Server V9.5.0
Binding package automatically ... E:\DB2\9.5\SQLLIB\BND\DB2COMMON.BND ... successful!
Binding package automatically ... E:\DB2\9.5\SQLLIB\BND\DB2MOVE.BND ... successful!
* LOAD:  table "DB2INST1"."ACT"
  -Rows read:         18
  -Loaded:            18
  -Rejected:           0
  -Deleted:            0
  -Committed:         18
* LOAD:  table "DB2INST1"."CL_SCHED"
  -Rows read:          5
  -Loaded:             5
  -Rejected:           0
  -Deleted:            0
  -Committed:          5
--中间很多记录省略
--发现identity表导入失败,需要手工处理
* LOAD:  table "DB2INST1"."T_XFF"
***  WARNING 3107.  Check message file tab19.msg!
***  SQL Warning!  SQLCODE is  3107
***  SQL3107W  消息文件中至少有一条警告消息。
  -Rows read:          3
  -Loaded:             0
  -Rejected:           3
  -Deleted:            0
  -Committed:          3
Disconnecting from database ... successful!
End time:  Sun Apr 15 23:00:26 2012

7.重新导入identity表

D:\move_s>db2 connect to db_xff
   数据库连接信息
 数据库服务器         = DB2/NT 9.5.0
 SQL 授权标识         = XIFENFEI
 本地数据库别名       = DB_XFF
D:\move_s>DB2 "load from tab19.ixf of ixf modified by identityoverride insert into db2inst1.t_xff"
SQL3501W  由于禁用数据库正向恢复,因此表所驻留的表空间将不被置于备份暂挂状态。
SQL3551W  表至少包含实用程序将覆盖的一个 GENERATED ALWAYS 列。
SQL3109N  实用程序正在开始从文件 "D:\move_s\tab19.ixf" 装入数据。
SQL3500W  在时间 "2012-04-15 23:06:52.393775",实用程序在开始 "LOAD"。
SQL3150N  PC/IXF 文件中的 H 记录具有产品 "DB2    02.00",日期 "20120405"和时间 "202132"。
SQL3153N  PC/IXF 文件中的 T 记录具有名称 "tab19.ixf",限定符 "" 和源 ""。
SQL3519W  开始装入一致点。输入记录数 = "0"。
SQL3520W  “装入一致点”成功。
SQL3110N  实用程序已完成处理。从输入文件读了 "3" 行。
SQL3519W  开始装入一致点。输入记录数 = "3"。
SQL3520W  “装入一致点”成功。
SQL3515W  在时间 "2012-04-15 23:06:52.451619",实用程序已经完成了 "LOAD"。
读取行数         = 3
跳过行数         = 0
装入行数         = 3
拒绝行数         = 0
删除行数         = 0
落实行数         = 3
D:\move_s>db2 "select * from db2inst1.t_xff"
XID    X_NAME
------ ------------------------------
     1 www.xifenfei.com
     2 XIFENFEI
     3 xifenfei
  3 条记录已选择。