联系：手机/微信(+86 17813235971) QQ(107644445)
作者：惜分飞©版权所有[未经本人同意,不得以任何形式转载,否则有进一步追究法律责任的权利.]
核心生产库突然负载飙升,我的压力来了,通过分析是一条sql的执行计划改变引起该故障,最终通过sql profile固定执行计划解决该问题
数据库主机负载
这里明显表现系统load 偏高，而且还在上升中；top的进程中，占用cpu都计划100%
top - 16:25:39 up 123 days, 1:42, 4 users, load average: 46.19, 45.08, 43.93 Tasks: 1469 total, 28 running, 1439 sleeping, 0 stopped, 2 zombie Cpu(s): 45.9%us, 1.1%sy, 0.0%ni, 47.1%id, 5.2%wa, 0.1%hi, 0.6%si, 0.0%st Mem: 264253752k total, 262605260k used, 1648492k free, 413408k buffers Swap: 33554424k total, 458684k used, 33095740k free, 67110504k cached PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 2622 oracle 18 0 150g 34m 28m R 100.0 0.0 11:58.21 oracleq9db1 (LOCAL=NO) 15881 oracle 21 0 150g 35m 28m R 100.0 0.0 72:14.20 oracleq9db1 (LOCAL=NO) 17214 oracle 19 0 150g 38m 32m R 100.0 0.0 20:47.44 oracleq9db1 (LOCAL=NO) 17705 oracle 21 0 150g 34m 28m R 100.0 0.0 27:33.00 oracleq9db1 (LOCAL=NO) 6110 oracle 19 0 150g 34m 28m R 99.8 0.0 12:33.34 oracleq9db1 (LOCAL=NO) 6876 oracle 19 0 150g 34m 27m R 99.5 0.0 12:43.90 oracleq9db1 (LOCAL=NO) 17205 oracle 23 0 150g 34m 27m R 99.5 0.0 21:37.18 oracleq9db1 (LOCAL=NO) 24629 oracle 20 0 150g 35m 29m R 99.5 0.0 28:10.62 oracleq9db1 (LOCAL=NO) 26959 oracle 19 0 150g 34m 27m R 99.5 0.0 47:17.87 oracleq9db1 (LOCAL=NO) 7655 oracle 18 0 150g 30m 25m R 98.5 0.0 2:28.45 oracleq9db1 (LOCAL=NO) 16377 oracle 18 0 150g 34m 28m R 98.5 0.0 36:07.11 oracleq9db1 (LOCAL=NO) 24637 oracle 18 0 150g 37m 30m R 98.2 0.0 26:39.15 oracleq9db1 (LOCAL=NO) 6106 oracle 21 0 150g 40m 33m R 97.2 0.0 11:37.75 oracleq9db1 (LOCAL=NO) 28785 oracle 18 0 150g 34m 28m R 96.9 0.0 24:03.29 oracleq9db1 (LOCAL=NO) 24278 oracle 17 0 150g 31m 26m S 96.5 0.0 3:15.51 oracleq9db1 (LOCAL=NO) 24283 oracle 17 0 150g 33m 28m S 96.5 0.0 6:25.26 oracleq9db1 (LOCAL=NO) 7098 oracle 18 0 150g 32m 27m R 94.6 0.0 2:20.22 oracleq9db1 (LOCAL=NO) 6874 oracle 17 0 150g 34m 28m R 87.0 0.0 12:02.92 oracleq9db1 (LOCAL=NO) 18206 oracle 16 0 150g 34m 27m R 86.1 0.0 16:11.28 oracleq9db1 (LOCAL=NO) 7096 oracle 17 0 150g 29m 24m R 85.4 0.0 3:01.72 oracleq9db1 (LOCAL=NO)
数据库等待事件
SID EVENT
---------- ----------------------------------------------------------------
183 gc cr request
185 latch: cache buffers chains
239 db file sequential read
292 gc cr request
406 gc cr request
410 db file sequential read
463 gc current request
572 gc buffer busy acquire
575 gc buffer busy acquire
577 latch: cache buffers chains
629 db file sequential read
747 gc cr request
919 latch: cache buffers chains
974 gc cr request
1033 log file sync
1141 db file parallel write
1153 gc cr request
1199 db file sequential read
1378 db file sequential read
1495 gc cr request
1540 db file parallel write
1547 gc buffer busy acquire
1662 gc cr request
1715 gc buffer busy acquire
1770 SQL*Net message to client
1830 latch: cache buffers chains
1884 gc cr request
2113 db file sequential read
2173 db file sequential read
2229 rdbms ipc reply
2292 db file sequential read
2341 db file sequential read
2348 gc cr request
2460 gc cr request
2632 gc cr request
2684 gc cr request
2687 db file sequential read
2749 db file sequential read
2913 gc cr request
2967 db file sequential read
3038 gc cr request
3087 SQL*Net message to client
3089 gc cr request
3194 db file sequential read
3195 db file sequential read
3309 latch: cache buffers chains
3371 gc cr request
3485 gc cr request
3535 gc cr request
可以这里有很多gc cr request等待和cache buffers chains等待，第一反应就是很可能系统某条sql执行计划不正确导致逻辑读剧增.
分析awr报告
故障时候的逻辑读 top sql可以看出来cdwjdd67x27mh的sql逻辑读异常大
分析正常时间点awr报告中cdwjdd67x27mh逻辑读情况
通过对比可以发现两个awr中，cdwjdd67x27mh 语句执行次数差不多，但是单次逻辑读从800多突变为34000多，增加了40多倍
cdwjdd67x27mh 语句分析
执行计划
17:36:08 sys@Q9DB>select * from table(dbms_xplan.display_awr('cdwjdd67x27mh'));
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SQL_ID cdwjdd67x27mh
--------------------
select * from ( select * from GE_TAOBAO_BILL o
WHERE 1=1 and
o.CREATED_TIME >= :1 and o.CREATED_TIME < :2
and o.REC_SITE_ID = :3
and o.STATUS_ID = :4
and o.SERVICE_TYPE = :5 ) where rownum
<= 36000
Plan hash value: 647855111
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time | Pstart| Pstop |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | | | 5 (100)| | |
| 1 | COUNT STOPKEY | | | | | | |
| 2 | FILTER | | | | | | |
| 3 | PARTITION RANGE ITERATOR | | 1 | 455 | 5 (0)| 00:00:01 | KEY | KEY |
| 4 | TABLE ACCESS BY LOCAL INDEX ROWID| GE_TAOBAO_BILL | 1 | 455 | 5 (0)| 00:00:01 | KEY | KEY |
| 5 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IDX_TAOBAO_BILL_CR_ISDP_S | 1 | | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 | KEY | KEY |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SQL_ID cdwjdd67x27mh
--------------------
select * from ( select * from GE_TAOBAO_BILL o
WHERE 1=1 and
o.CREATED_TIME >= :1 and o.CREATED_TIME < :2
and o.REC_SITE_ID = :3
and o.STATUS_ID = :4
and o.SERVICE_TYPE = :5 ) where rownum
<= 36000
Plan hash value: 2979024279
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time | Pstart| Pstop |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | | | 13 (100)| | ||
| 1 | COUNT STOPKEY | | | | | | ||
| 2 | FILTER | | | | | | ||
| 3 | PARTITION RANGE ITERATOR | | 1 | 455 | 13 (0)| 00:00:01 | KEY | KEY |
| 4 | TABLE ACCESS BY LOCAL INDEX ROWID| GE_TAOBAO_BILL | 1 | 455 | 13 (0)| 00:00:01 | KEY | KEY |
| 5 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IDX_TAOBAO_BILL_CR_REC_S | 4 | | 9 (0)| 00:00:01 | KEY | KEY |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
这里可以发现cdwjdd67x27mh在数据库中有两个执行计划
通过awr数据，看执行计划的变化情况
10:50:29 sys@Q9DB>select a.INSTANCE_NUMBER,a.snap_id,a.sql_id,a.plan_hash_value,b.begin_interval_time
10:50:30 2 from dba_hist_sqlstat a, dba_hist_snapshot b
10:50:30 3 where sql_id ='cdwjdd67x27mh'
10:50:30 4 and a.snap_id = b.snap_id
10:50:30 5 order by instance_number,begin_interval_time desc;
INSTANCE_NUMBER SNAP_ID SQL_ID PLAN_HASH_VALUE BEGIN_INTERVAL_TIME
--------------- ---------- ------------- --------------- ----------------------------------------
1 20719 cdwjdd67x27mh 2979024279 12-MAY-14 05.00.12.753 PM
1 20719 cdwjdd67x27mh 647855111 12-MAY-14 05.00.12.753 PM
1 20719 cdwjdd67x27mh 2979024279 12-MAY-14 05.00.12.702 PM
1 20719 cdwjdd67x27mh 647855111 12-MAY-14 05.00.12.702 PM
1 20718 cdwjdd67x27mh 647855111 12-MAY-14 04.00.24.197 PM
1 20718 cdwjdd67x27mh 2979024279 12-MAY-14 04.00.24.197 PM
1 20718 cdwjdd67x27mh 647855111 12-MAY-14 04.00.24.172 PM
1 20718 cdwjdd67x27mh 2979024279 12-MAY-14 04.00.24.172 PM
1 20717 cdwjdd67x27mh 647855111 12-MAY-14 03.11.22.251 PM
1 20717 cdwjdd67x27mh 2979024279 12-MAY-14 03.11.22.251 PM
1 20717 cdwjdd67x27mh 647855111 12-MAY-14 03.11.22.188 PM
1 20717 cdwjdd67x27mh 2979024279 12-MAY-14 03.11.22.188 PM
………………
1 20696 cdwjdd67x27mh 2979024279 11-MAY-14 07.00.07.142 PM
1 20696 cdwjdd67x27mh 2979024279 11-MAY-14 07.00.07.105 PM
1 20695 cdwjdd67x27mh 2979024279 11-MAY-14 06.00.12.771 PM
1 20695 cdwjdd67x27mh 2979024279 11-MAY-14 06.00.12.707 PM
1 20694 cdwjdd67x27mh 2979024279 11-MAY-14 05.00.48.249 PM
1 20694 cdwjdd67x27mh 2979024279 11-MAY-14 05.00.48.170 PM
1 20693 cdwjdd67x27mh 2979024279 11-MAY-14 04.00.37.841 PM
…………
2 20719 cdwjdd67x27mh 2979024279 12-MAY-14 05.00.12.753 PM
2 20719 cdwjdd67x27mh 2979024279 12-MAY-14 05.00.12.702 PM
2 20718 cdwjdd67x27mh 2979024279 12-MAY-14 04.00.24.197 PM
2 20718 cdwjdd67x27mh 2979024279 12-MAY-14 04.00.24.172 PM
2 20717 cdwjdd67x27mh 2979024279 12-MAY-14 03.11.22.251 PM
2 20717 cdwjdd67x27mh 2979024279 12-MAY-14 03.11.22.188 PM
这里可以清晰看到，执行计划在1节点中发生震荡(两个执行计划都有选择)，仔细看两个执行计划，会发现就是查询的时候所使用的index不同而已,继续分析两个index
IDX_TAOBAO_BILL_CR_ISDP_S CREATED_TIME 1 IDX_TAOBAO_BILL_CR_ISDP_S IS_DISPART 2 IDX_TAOBAO_BILL_CR_ISDP_S STATUS_ID 3 IDX_TAOBAO_BILL_CR_REC_S REC_SITE_ID 1 IDX_TAOBAO_BILL_CR_REC_S CREATED_TIME 2 IDX_TAOBAO_BILL_CR_REC_S STATUS_ID 3
分析数据分布情况(其他列省略)
TABLE_NAME COLUMN_NAME NUM_DISTINCT LAST_ANAL ------------------------------ ------------------------------ ------------ --------- GE_TAOBAO_BILL CREATED_TIME 287080448 05-MAY-14 GE_TAOBAO_BILL REC_SITE_ID 13176 05-MAY-14 GE_TAOBAO_BILL IS_DISPART 2 05-MAY-14 GE_TAOBAO_BILL STATUS_ID 7 05-MAY-14
这里可以看到数据库在正常的时候使用IDX_TAOBAO_BILL_CR_REC_S没有问题，但是在某些情况下选择使用IDX_TAOBAO_BILL_CR_ISDP_S这个就有问题,导致逻辑读过高,其实对于该sql语句，是因为IDX_TAOBAO_BILL_CR_REC_S 索引不合理导致，如果创建CREATED_TIME,REC_SITE_ID,STATUS_ID，就不会因为传输的值范围不同而使用IDX_TAOBAO_BILL_CR_ISDP_S的情况。针对该情况，因为表非常大，短时间内无法修改index，只能考虑使用 sql profile固定执行计划
sql profile固定计划
SQL>@coe_xfr_sql_profile.sql cdwjdd67x27mh
Parameter 1:
SQL_ID (required)
PLAN_HASH_VALUE AVG_ET_SECS
--------------- -----------
2979024279 .011
647855111 5.164
Parameter 2:
PLAN_HASH_VALUE (required)
Enter value for 2: 2979024279
Values passed:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
SQL_ID : "cdwjdd67x27mh"
PLAN_HASH_VALUE: "2979024279"
Execute coe_xfr_sql_profile_cdwjdd67x27mh_2979024279.sql
on TARGET system in order to create a custom SQL Profile
with plan 2979024279 linked to adjusted sql_text.
COE_XFR_SQL_PROFILE completed.
SQL>@coe_xfr_sql_profile_cdwjdd67x27mh_2979024279.sql
SQL>DECLARE
2 sql_txt CLOB;
3 h SYS.SQLPROF_ATTR;
4 BEGIN
5 sql_txt := q'[
6 select * from ( select
7 *
8
9 from
10
11 GE_TAOBAO_BILL
12
13 o
14
15 WHERE 1=1
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27 and o.CREATED_TIME >= :1
28
29
30 and o.CREATED_TIME < :2
31
32
33 and o.REC_SITE_ID = :3
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49 and o.STATUS_ID = :4
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64 and o.SERVICE_TYPE = :5 ) where rownum <= 36000
65 ]';
66 h := SYS.SQLPROF_ATTR(
67 q'[BEGIN_OUTLINE_DATA]',
68 q'[IGNORE_OPTIM_EMBEDDED_HINTS]',
69 q'[OPTIMIZER_FEATURES_ENABLE('11.2.0.3')]',
70 q'[DB_VERSION('11.2.0.3')]',
71 q'[FIRST_ROWS]',
72 q'[OUTLINE_LEAF(@"SEL$F5BB74E1")]',
73 q'[MERGE(@"SEL$2")]',
74 q'[OUTLINE(@"SEL$1")]',
75 q'[OUTLINE(@"SEL$2")]',
76 q'[INDEX_RS_ASC(@"SEL$F5BB74E1" "O"@"SEL$2" ("GE_TAOBAO_BILL"."REC_SITE_ID" "GE_TAOBAO_BILL"."CREATED_TIME" "GE_TAOBAO_BILL"."STATUS_ID"))]',
77 q'[END_OUTLINE_DATA]');
78 :signature := DBMS_SQLTUNE.SQLTEXT_TO_SIGNATURE(sql_txt);
79 DBMS_SQLTUNE.IMPORT_SQL_PROFILE (
80 sql_text => sql_txt,
81 profile => h,
82 name => 'coe_cdwjdd67x27mh_2979024279',
83 description => 'coe cdwjdd67x27mh 2979024279 '||:signature||'',
84 category => 'DEFAULT',
85 validate => TRUE,
86 replace => TRUE,
87 force_match => FALSE /* TRUE:FORCE (match even when different literals in SQL). FALSE:EXACT (similar to CURSOR_SHARING) */ );
88 END;
89 /
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL>WHENEVER SQLERROR CONTINUE
SQL>SET ECHO OFF;
SIGNATURE
---------------------
18414135509058398362
... manual custom SQL Profile has been created
COE_XFR_SQL_PROFILE_cdwjdd67x27mh_2979024279 completed
固定执行计划后，系统负载恢复正常
load恢复正常，单个进程占用cpu 也正常
top - 18:25:29 up 123 days, 4:25, 3 users, load average: 17.59, 16.72, 16.10 Tasks: 1559 total, 6 running, 1551 sleeping, 0 stopped, 2 zombie Cpu(s): 6.2%us, 1.2%sy, 0.0%ni, 84.3%id, 7.4%wa, 0.1%hi, 0.9%si, 0.0%st Mem: 264253752k total, 262395300k used, 1858452k free, 305928k buffers Swap: 33554424k total, 467420k used, 33087004k free, 66811412k cached PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 3010 oracle 15 0 150g 26m 21m S 23.6 0.0 0:08.60 oracleq9db2 (LOCAL=NO) 26936 oracle 15 0 150g 33m 28m S 22.9 0.0 0:12.53 oracleq9db2 (LOCAL=NO) 9691 oracle 15 0 150g 34m 28m D 21.0 0.0 0:48.73 oracleq9db2 (LOCAL=NO) 9694 oracle 15 0 150g 34m 28m S 17.4 0.0 0:45.74 oracleq9db2 (LOCAL=NO) 14366 oracle 15 0 150g 33m 28m R 17.4 0.0 0:25.11 oracleq9db2 (LOCAL=NO) 2471 oracle -2 0 150g 180m 37m S 16.7 0.1 10795:55 ora_lms3_q9db2 2463 oracle -2 0 150g 180m 37m S 15.7 0.1 10648:38 ora_lms1_q9db2 2459 oracle -2 0 150g 180m 37m S 14.8 0.1 10726:42 ora_lms0_q9db2 2467 oracle -2 0 150g 180m 36m S 14.8 0.1 10980:33 ora_lms2_q9db2 13324 oracle 15 0 150g 31m 26m S 14.1 0.0 0:22.75 oracleq9db2 (LOCAL=NO) 16740 oracle 15 0 150g 34m 28m R 13.4 0.0 0:43.85 oracleq9db2 (LOCAL=NO) 1908 oracle 15 0 150g 27m 22m S 11.8 0.0 0:03.95 oracleq9db2 (LOCAL=NO) 9689 oracle 15 0 150g 33m 27m S 11.8 0.0 0:46.01 oracleq9db2 (LOCAL=NO) 19410 oracle 15 0 150g 31m 26m S 11.8 0.0 0:43.18 oracleq9db2 (LOCAL=NO) 14102 oracle 15 0 150g 31m 25m S 11.5 0.0 2:17.23 oracleq9db2 (LOCAL=NO) 1914 oracle 15 0 150g 29m 24m S 11.1 0.0 0:04.77 oracleq9db2 (LOCAL=NO) 31106 oracle 15 0 150g 34m 28m S 9.8 0.0 1:24.85 oracleq9db2 (LOCAL=NO) 31139 oracle 15 0 150g 30m 24m S 9.8 0.0 1:21.75 oracleq9db2 (LOCAL=NO) 2498 oracle 15 0 150g 42m 35m S 7.9 0.0 3838:43 ora_lgwr_q9db2 28108 oracle 15 0 150g 36m 29m S 7.9 0.0 0:18.19 oracleq9db2 (LOCAL=NO) 2392 oracle 15 0 150g 35m 17m S 7.5 0.0 5304:57 ora_lmd0_q9db2