Linux – Database SOS

arm环境vg损坏mysql数据库恢复

国庆节期间接到朋友咨询,原先在vg中的磁盘被重新pvcreate了,想恢复原磁盘中的mysql数据库

通过分析系统的history日志,发现操作不是简单的pvcreate,我简单梳理下操作步骤
故障之前磁盘情况

[root@0002 ~]# lsblk
NAME                  MAJ:MIN RM  SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
sr0                    11:0    1 1024M  0 rom  
vda                   253:0    0  200G  0 disk 
├─vda1                253:1    0  600M  0 part /boot/efi
├─vda2                253:2    0    1G  0 part /boot
└─vda3                253:3    0 38.4G  0 part 
  ├─klas-root         252:0    0 34.4G  0 lvm  /
  └─klas-swap         252:1    0    4G  0 lvm  [SWAP]
vdb                   253:16   0 1000G  0 disk 
└─vdb1                253:17   0  500G  0 part 
  └─mysql-mysql--mycg 252:2    0  500G  0 lvm  /mysql

这里可以看到出来vdb磁盘一共1000G,分区vdb1 为500G,然后这500G加入到vg中并分配了lv.

vdb磁盘现状

[root@0002 mysql]# lsblk /dev/vdb
NAME                  MAJ:MIN RM  SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
vdb                   253:16   0 1000G  0 disk 
└─vdb1                253:17   0 1000G  0 part 

Disk /dev/vdb: 1000 GiB, 1073741824000 bytes, 2097152000 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disklabel type: dos
Disk identifier: 0x5a6aaeee

Device     Boot Start        End    Sectors  Size Id Type
/dev/vdb1        2048 2097151999 2097149952 1000G 8e Linux LVM

这里基本上可以确定,vdb1磁盘分区从以前的500G变成了1000G（也就是说被重新分区了,后续和现场沟通确认进行了重新分区操作）

通过history日志追述大概的操作过程

  898  [2025-09-28 11:55:13][root]fdisk -l
  899  [2025-09-28 11:55:21][root]df -h
  900  [2025-09-28 11:56:41][root]lsblk
  901  [2025-09-28 11:59:44][root]fdisk /dev/vdb
  902  [2025-09-28 12:00:46][root]partprobe /dev/vdb
  903  [2025-09-28 12:00:50][root]pvresize /dev/vdb1
  904  [2025-09-28 12:00:56][root]df -h
  905  [2025-09-28 12:01:25][root]vgdisplay mysql
  906  [2025-09-28 12:01:40][root]lsblk
  907  [2025-09-28 12:02:05][root]sudo partprobe /dev/vdb
  908  [2025-09-28 12:02:10][root]pvresize /dev/vdb1
  909  [2025-09-28 12:02:27][root]sudo pvresize /dev/vdb1
  910  [2025-09-28 12:03:07][root]sudo pvcreate /dev/vdb1
  911  [2025-09-28 12:03:22][root]sudo pvscan
  912  [2025-09-28 12:03:30][root]sudo pvdisplay
  913  [2025-09-28 12:05:37][root]parted /dev/vdb
  914  [2025-09-28 12:06:11][root]pvresize /dev/vdb1
  915  [2025-09-28 12:06:15][root]lsblk
  916  [2025-09-28 12:09:48][root]lvextend -l +100%FREE /dev/mysql/mysql--mycg
  917  [2025-09-28 12:10:00][root]cd /dev/mysql/
  918  [2025-09-28 12:10:01][root]ll
  919  [2025-09-28 12:10:20][root]pwd
  920  [2025-09-28 12:10:32][root]lvextend -l +100%FREE /dev/mysql/mysql-mycg
  921  [2025-09-28 12:10:55][root]lsblk /dev/vdb

基本上可以确定9月28日先进行了fdisk分区操作,然后尝试pvresize 操作[应该不会成功,因为重新分区导致pv信息丢失],然后进行了pvcreate之后再次进行parted分区操作,再pvresize,lvextend操作[同理pv信息丢失应该不会成功],然后10月5日继续进行的部分操作

  956  [2025-10-05 08:29:27][root]umount /mysql
  957  [2025-10-05 08:29:38][root]lsof /mysql
  958  [2025-10-05 08:29:58][root]service mysqld stop
  959  [2025-10-05 08:30:02][root]umount /mysql
  960  [2025-10-05 08:30:05][root]lsof /mysql
  961  [2025-10-05 08:30:23][root]cd /
  962  [2025-10-05 08:30:25][root]umount /mysql
  963  [2025-10-05 08:30:34][root]pvcreate --force /dev/vdb1
  964  [2025-10-05 08:30:47][root]vgextend mysql /dev/vdb1
  965  [2025-10-05 08:31:02][root]df -h
  966  [2025-10-05 08:31:33][root]pvdisplay /dev/vdb1
  967  [2025-10-05 08:31:41][root]pvcreate --force /dev/vdb1
  968  [2025-10-05 08:32:11][root]lvs | grep mysql-mysql--mycg
  969  [2025-10-05 08:32:19][root]dmsetup ls | grep mysql
  970  [2025-10-05 08:32:38][root]fuser /dev/vdb1
  971  [2025-10-05 08:32:41][root]lsof /dev/vdb1
  972  [2025-10-05 08:32:50][root]pvcreate --force /dev/vdb1
  973  [2025-10-05 08:33:14][root]reboot
  974  [2025-10-05 08:36:23][root]pvcreate --force /dev/vdb1
  975  [2025-10-05 08:36:47][root]lvdisplay /dev/mapper/mysql-mysql--mycg
  976  [2025-10-05 08:36:53][root]vgextend mysql /dev/vdb1
  977  [2025-10-05 08:37:10][root]lvextend -l +100%FREE /dev/mysql/mysql--mycg

初步看,应该是先尝试umount /dev/vdb1,但是没有成功,然后直接reboot重启了主机,起来之后,进行了pvcreate[操作成功],vgextend,lvextend等操作[失败,因为vg里面的之前的pv信息已经丢失],而且之前lv无法mount成功,数据库文件/备份均在这个lv里面,而且从库很久之前没有正常同步.基于这样的情况,就一定要对vdb磁盘中数据进行恢复.查看操作系统信息,确认是arm系统

由于arm系统一般工具均无法正常解析,只能让客户把磁盘挂载到x86环境进行处理,通过专业恢复工具解析,运气不错可以直接读取数据

传输数据到客户服务器中,并成功启动mysql,客户测试业务没有任何问题,数据完整恢复

redhat系列7/8进入单用户模式

联系：手机/微信(+86 17813235971) QQ(107644445)

标题：redhat系列7/8进入单用户模式

以前写过一篇文章在linux老版本中,进入单用户模式的方法:linux 4/5/6版本进入单用户模式,今天测试主流的redhat系列(测试使用OEL,没有本质区别)7和8版本中进入单用户.
主要操作步骤:
1)选择linux启动项,输入e
2)根据你的RHEL/CentOS/OEL版本,找到 linux16/linux/linuxefi等类似启动语句语句，按下键盘上的 End 键,跳到行末,添加关键词 rd.break，按下 Ctrl+x 或 F10 来进入单用户模式
3)mount 根文件系统为读写模式:mount -o remount,rw /sysroot
4)指定/sysroot为/挂载点:chroot /sysroot
5)进行需要的系统操作,比如重设root密码,修改不合适的系统配置(fstab,sysctl.conf等),然后sync同步数据
6)重启系统:reboot -f(也可以两次exit实现重启)
linux 7系列进入单用户演示

linux 8系列进入单用户演示

Failed to open \EFI\redhat\grubx64.efi – Not Found 故障处理

联系：手机/微信(+86 17813235971) QQ(107644445)

标题：Failed to open EFIredhatgrubx64.efi – Not Found 故障处理

由于某种原因导致linux的grubx64.efi文件丢失,系统重启报错（Failed to open \EFI\redhat\grubx64.efi – Not Found）

grubx64.efi 是 64 位 UEFI 系统下的 GRUB 引导程序核心文件,作用是启动操作系统.现在系统启动报该文件丢失,导致系统无法正常引导启动.对于这样的情况,比较简单的方法就是使用相同版本的操作系统iso文件进入救援模式,然后把grubx64.efi文件拷贝进去,具体操作步骤:
1.使用光盘启动,并进入Troubleshooting –> 并回车

2. 选择:Rescue a Oracle Linux system 并回车

3. 选择1) Continue ,然后回车继续执行

4. 可以看到原系统分区被挂载在/mnt/sysimage下面的相关挂载点

5. 输入chroot /mnt/sysimage按照原系统方式进行挂载

6. 确认grubx64.efi文件丢失

7. 挂载系统盘到/media,并确认grubx64.efi文件在系统盘中存在

8. 拷贝系统盘中的grubx64.efi到/boot/efi/EFI/redhat/中

9. 退出救援模式,系统启动正常,完成grubx64.efi文件丢失修复故障

Linux 8 修改网卡名称

联系：手机/微信(+86 17813235971) QQ(107644445)

标题：Linux 8 修改网卡名称

在某些情况下,我们希望通过修改网卡的名称,从而避免应用层面的一些配置(比如oracle rac 网络从千兆换成万兆,我们直接把万兆网卡的名称修改和之前使用的网卡名称一致,集群层面不用做任何配置),这里做一个测试,验证在linux 8（redhat/oracle linux/Rocky/AlmaLinux/centos等）修改网卡名称可行性:
查看当前主机网卡名称情况(有两个网卡ens160和ens192)

[root@xifenfeidg network-scripts]# cat /etc/redhat-release 
Red Hat Enterprise Linux release 8.9 (Ootpa)
[root@xifenfeidg network-scripts]# cat /etc/oracle-release 
Oracle Linux Server release 8.9
[root@xifenfeidg network-scripts]# ifconfig
ens160: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST>  mtu 1500
        inet 192.168.118.141  netmask 255.255.255.0  broadcast 192.168.118.255
        inet6 fe80::20c:29ff:fe2d:1c85  prefixlen 64  scopeid 0x20<link>
        ether 00:0c:29:2d:1c:85  txqueuelen 1000  (Ethernet)
        RX packets 265118  bytes 392933574 (374.7 MiB)
        RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
        TX packets 24828  bytes 1374591 (1.3 MiB)
        TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0

ens192: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST>  mtu 1500
        inet 192.168.222.18  netmask 255.255.255.0  broadcast 192.168.222.255
        inet6 fe80::20c:29ff:fe2d:1c8f  prefixlen 64  scopeid 0x20<link>
        ether 00:0c:29:2d:1c:8f  txqueuelen 1000  (Ethernet)
        RX packets 165  bytes 18748 (18.3 KiB)
        RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
        TX packets 127  bytes 21755 (21.2 KiB)
        TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0

lo: flags=73<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING>  mtu 65536
        inet 127.0.0.1  netmask 255.0.0.0
        inet6 ::1  prefixlen 128  scopeid 0x10<host>
        loop  txqueuelen 1000  (Local Loopback)
        RX packets 6403  bytes 648853 (633.6 KiB)
        RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
        TX packets 6403  bytes 648853 (633.6 KiB)
        TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0

virbr0: flags=4099<UP,BROADCAST,MULTICAST>  mtu 1500
        ether 52:54:00:ab:b4:34  txqueuelen 1000  (Ethernet)
        RX packets 0  bytes 0 (0.0 B)
        RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
        TX packets 0  bytes 0 (0.0 B)
        TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0

[root@xifenfeidg ~]# nmcli d s
DEVICE  TYPE      STATE      CONNECTION 
ens160  ethernet  connected  ens160     
ens192  ethernet  connected  ens192     
virbr0  bridge    unmanaged  --         
lo      loopback  unmanaged  --   

[root@xifenfeidg ~]# cd /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/
[root@xifenfeidg network-scripts]# ls
ifcfg-ens160  ifcfg-ens192

尝试把ens160修改为ens191,删除ens160设备

[root@xifenfeidg network-scripts]# nmcli connection delete ens160
Connection 'ens160' (ae9669d8-3db3-424e-8a0e-41d8b05197d0) successfully deleted.
[root@xifenfeidg network-scripts]# ifconfig
ens160: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST>  mtu 1500
        ether 00:0c:29:2d:1c:85  txqueuelen 1000  (Ethernet)
        RX packets 291009  bytes 431437623 (411.4 MiB)
        RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
        TX packets 27085  bytes 1499570 (1.4 MiB)
        TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0

ens192: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST>  mtu 1500
        inet 192.168.222.18  netmask 255.255.255.0  broadcast 192.168.222.255
        inet6 fe80::20c:29ff:fe2d:1c8f  prefixlen 64  scopeid 0x20<link>
        ether 00:0c:29:2d:1c:8f  txqueuelen 1000  (Ethernet)
        RX packets 193  bytes 21530 (21.0 KiB)
        RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
        TX packets 156  bytes 27505 (26.8 KiB)
        TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0

lo: flags=73<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING>  mtu 65536
        inet 127.0.0.1  netmask 255.0.0.0
        inet6 ::1  prefixlen 128  scopeid 0x10<host>
        loop  txqueuelen 1000  (Local Loopback)
        RX packets 6427  bytes 650593 (635.3 KiB)
        RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
        TX packets 6427  bytes 650593 (635.3 KiB)
        TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0

virbr0: flags=4099<UP,BROADCAST,MULTICAST>  mtu 1500
        ether 52:54:00:ab:b4:34  txqueuelen 1000  (Ethernet)
        RX packets 0  bytes 0 (0.0 B)
        RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
        TX packets 0  bytes 0 (0.0 B)
        TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0

[root@xifenfeidg network-scripts]# nmcli d s
DEVICE  TYPE      STATE         CONNECTION 
ens192  ethernet  connected     ens192     
ens160  ethernet  disconnected  --         
virbr0  bridge    unmanaged     --         
lo      loopback  unmanaged     --

增加ens191设备(注意mac地址使用之前ens160)

[root@xifenfeidg network-scripts]# nmcli connection add type ethernet con-name ens191 ifname ens191  mac 00:0c:29:2d:1c:85
Connection 'ens191' (62a5fd83-8dc9-407d-83cc-1327d400fa0b) successfully added.
[root@xifenfeidg network-scripts]# 
[root@xifenfeidg network-scripts]# nmcli d s
DEVICE  TYPE      STATE         CONNECTION 
ens192  ethernet  connected     ens192     
ens160  ethernet  disconnected  --         
virbr0  bridge    unmanaged     --         
lo      loopback  unmanaged     --

重启主机

[root@xifenfeidg network-scripts]# reboot

Activate the web console with: systemctl enable --now cockpit.socket

Last login: Tue Sep  3 14:12:20 2024 from 192.168.222.1

重启之后登录主机查看网络信息(确认网卡名称从ens160修改为ens191)

[root@xifenfeidg ~]# ip addr
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000
    link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
    inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
    inet6 ::1/128 scope host 
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
2: ens191: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UP group default qlen 1000
    link/ether 00:0c:29:2d:1c:85 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
    altname enp3s0
    inet 192.168.118.141/24 brd 192.168.118.255 scope global dynamic noprefixroute ens191
       valid_lft 1788sec preferred_lft 1788sec
    inet6 fe80::30e4:c5bf:692a:2753/64 scope link noprefixroute 
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
3: ens192: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UP group default qlen 1000
    link/ether 00:0c:29:2d:1c:8f brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
    altname enp11s0
    inet 192.168.222.18/24 brd 192.168.222.255 scope global noprefixroute ens192
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
    inet6 fe80::20c:29ff:fe2d:1c8f/64 scope link 
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
4: virbr0: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state DOWN group default qlen 1000
    link/ether 52:54:00:ab:b4:34 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
    inet 192.168.122.1/24 brd 192.168.122.255 scope global virbr0
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
[root@xifenfeidg ~]# cd /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/
[root@xifenfeidg network-scripts]# ls -ltr
total 8
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 308 Jul 31 05:04 ifcfg-ens192
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 300 Sep  3 14:16 ifcfg-ens191
[root@xifenfeidg network-scripts]# nmcli d s
DEVICE  TYPE      STATE                   CONNECTION 
ens191  ethernet  connected               ens191     
ens192  ethernet  connected               ens192     
virbr0  bridge    connected (externally)  virbr0     
lo      loopback  unmanaged               --

Oracle误删除数据文件恢复

联系：手机/微信(+86 17813235971) QQ(107644445)

标题：Oracle误删除数据文件恢复

有客户通过sftp误删除oracle数据文件,咨询我们是否可以恢复,通过远程上去检查,发现运气不错,数据库还没有crash,通过句柄找到被删除文件

oracle@cwgstestdb[testwctdb]/proc/20611/fd$ls -ltr
total 0
lr-x------ 1 oracle oinstall 64 Feb 20 14:03 9 -> /oracle/db19c/rdbms/mesg/oraus.msb
lrwx------ 1 oracle oinstall 64 Feb 20 14:03 8 -> /oracle/db19c/dbs/lkTESTWCTDB
lrwx------ 1 oracle oinstall 64 Feb 20 14:03 7 -> /oracle/db19c/dbs/hc_testwctdb.dat
lr-x------ 1 oracle oinstall 64 Feb 20 14:03 6 -> /var/lib/sss/mc/passwd
lr-x------ 1 oracle oinstall 64 Feb 20 14:03 5 -> /proc/20611/fd
lr-x------ 1 oracle oinstall 64 Feb 20 14:03 4 -> /oracle/db19c/rdbms/mesg/oraus.msb
lrwx------ 1 oracle oinstall 64 Feb 20 14:03 305 -> /oradata/ftms_zx_test01_data8.dbf
lrwx------ 1 oracle oinstall 64 Feb 20 14:03 304 -> /oradata/ftms_zx_test01_data7.dbf
lrwx------ 1 oracle oinstall 64 Feb 20 14:03 303 -> /oradata/ftms_zx_test01_data6.dbf
lrwx------ 1 oracle oinstall 64 Feb 20 14:03 302 -> '/oradata/ftms_zx_test01_data5.dbf (deleted)'
lrwx------ 1 oracle oinstall 64 Feb 20 14:03 301 -> '/oradata/ftms_zx_test01_data4.dbf (deleted)'
lrwx------ 1 oracle oinstall 64 Feb 20 14:03 300 -> '/oradata/ftms_zx_test01_data3.dbf (deleted)'
lr-x------ 1 oracle oinstall 64 Feb 20 14:03 3 -> /dev/null
lrwx------ 1 oracle oinstall 64 Feb 20 14:03 299 -> '/oradata/ftms_zx_test01_data2.dbf (deleted)'
lrwx------ 1 oracle oinstall 64 Feb 20 14:03 298 -> '/oradata/ftms_zx_test01_data1.dbf (deleted)'
lrwx------ 1 oracle oinstall 64 Feb 20 14:03 297 -> '/oradata/ftms_zx_test01_data.dbf (deleted)'
lrwx------ 1 oracle oinstall 64 Feb 20 14:03 296 -> /oradata/ftms_zx_test_data.dbf
lrwx------ 1 oracle oinstall 64 Feb 20 14:03 295 -> '/oradata/TESTWCTDB/sd.dbf (deleted)'
lrwx------ 1 oracle oinstall 64 Feb 20 14:03 294 -> /oradata/TESTWCTDB/ftms_cs3_jiamiceshi
lrwx------ 1 oracle oinstall 64 Feb 20 14:03 293 -> /langchao/dumpdata/FTMS_CS_TDE.dbf
lrwx------ 1 oracle oinstall 64 Feb 20 14:03 292 -> /oradata/ftms_zx_test01.dbf
lrwx------ 1 oracle oinstall 64 Feb 20 14:03 291 -> /langchao/dumpdata/FTMS_CS_DATA4.dbf
lrwx------ 1 oracle oinstall 64 Feb 20 14:03 290 -> '/oradata/ftms_zx_data5.dbf (deleted)'
lrwx------ 1 oracle oinstall 64 Feb 20 14:03 289 -> /langchao/dumpdata/FTMS_CS_DATA3.dbf
lrwx------ 1 oracle oinstall 64 Feb 20 14:03 288 -> /langchao/dumpdata/FTMS_CS_DATA2.dbf
lrwx------ 1 oracle oinstall 64 Feb 20 14:03 287 -> /langchao/dumpdata/FTMS_JD_DATA2.dbf
lrwx------ 1 oracle oinstall 64 Feb 20 14:03 286 -> '/oradata/LCBIPECDS _TEMP_DAT.DBF'
lrwx------ 1 oracle oinstall 64 Feb 20 14:03 285 -> '/oradata/rTB_MBFE_TEMP (deleted)'
lrwx------ 1 oracle oinstall 64 Feb 20 14:03 284 -> '/oradata/TESTWCTDB/temp01.dbf (deleted)'
lrwx------ 1 oracle oinstall 64 Feb 20 14:03 283 -> '/oradata/ftms_credit_data5.dbf (deleted)'
lrwx------ 1 oracle oinstall 64 Feb 20 14:03 282 -> /oradata/ftmshtdata.dbf
lrwx------ 1 oracle oinstall 64 Feb 20 14:03 281 -> '/oradata/dump_data/FTMS_CSBF_DATA.dbf (deleted)'
lrwx------ 1 oracle oinstall 64 Feb 20 14:03 280 -> /langchao/dumpdata/FTMS_NEWBL2_DATA.dbf
lrwx------ 1 oracle oinstall 64 Feb 20 14:03 279 -> /langchao/dumpdata/FTMS_CS_DATA.dbf
lrwx------ 1 oracle oinstall 64 Feb 20 14:03 278 -> /oradata/LCBIPECDS_DAT.DBF
lrwx------ 1 oracle oinstall 64 Feb 20 14:03 277 -> /oradata/rTB_MBFE
lrwx------ 1 oracle oinstall 64 Feb 20 14:03 276 -> /oradata/udpcount_02.dbf
lrwx------ 1 oracle oinstall 64 Feb 20 14:03 275 -> /oradata/udpcount_01.dbf
lrwx------ 1 oracle oinstall 64 Feb 20 14:03 274 -> '/oradata/ftms_credit_data_6.dbf (deleted)'
lrwx------ 1 oracle oinstall 64 Feb 20 14:03 273 -> /langchao/dumpdata/FTMS_JD_DATA.dbf
lrwx------ 1 oracle oinstall 64 Feb 20 14:03 272 -> '/oradata/ftms_old.dbf (deleted)'
lrwx------ 1 oracle oinstall 64 Feb 20 14:03 271 -> '/oradata/ftms_credit_data2.dbf (deleted)'
lrwx------ 1 oracle oinstall 64 Feb 20 14:03 270 -> /langchao/dumpdata/PJDIP_DATA.dbf
lrwx------ 1 oracle oinstall 64 Feb 20 14:03 269 -> '/oradata/ftms_credit_data.dbf (deleted)'
lrwx------ 1 oracle oinstall 64 Feb 20 14:03 268 -> /langchao/dumpdata/FTMS_NEWBL_DATA.dbf
lrwx------ 1 oracle oinstall 64 Feb 20 14:03 267 -> '/oradata/ftms_zx_data4.dbf (deleted)'
lrwx------ 1 oracle oinstall 64 Feb 20 14:03 266 -> /langchao/dumpdata/QIANZHANG_DATA.dbf
lrwx------ 1 oracle oinstall 64 Feb 20 14:03 265 -> '/oradata/ftms_zx_data3.dbf (deleted)'
lrwx------ 1 oracle oinstall 64 Feb 20 14:03 264 -> '/oradata/ftms_zx_data2.dbf (deleted)'
lrwx------ 1 oracle oinstall 64 Feb 20 14:03 263 -> '/oradata/ftms_zx_data.dbf (deleted)'
lrwx------ 1 oracle oinstall 64 Feb 20 14:03 262 -> /langchao/dumpdata/FTMSDIP_DATA.dbf
lrwx------ 1 oracle oinstall 64 Feb 20 14:03 261 -> /oradata/TESTWCTDB/users01.dbf
lrwx------ 1 oracle oinstall 64 Feb 20 14:03 260 -> '/oradata/TESTWCTDB/undotbs01.dbf (deleted)'
lrwx------ 1 oracle oinstall 64 Feb 20 14:03 259 -> '/oradata/TESTWCTDB/sysaux01.dbf (deleted)'
lrwx------ 1 oracle oinstall 64 Feb 20 14:03 258 -> '/oradata/TESTWCTDB/system01.dbf (deleted)'
lrwx------ 1 oracle oinstall 64 Feb 20 14:03 257 -> /oradata/TESTWCTDB/control02.ctl
lrwx------ 1 oracle oinstall 64 Feb 20 14:03 256 -> /oradata/TESTWCTDB/control01.ctl
l-wx------ 1 oracle oinstall 64 Feb 20 14:03 2 -> /dev/null
lrwx------ 1 oracle oinstall 64 Feb 20 14:03 10 -> 'socket:[823411]'
l-wx------ 1 oracle oinstall 64 Feb 20 14:03 1 -> /dev/null
lr-x------ 1 oracle oinstall 64 Feb 20 14:03 0 -> /dev/null

查询数据文件大小（被删除的文件文件大小通过v$datafile查询为0）

SQL> select name,bytes/1024/1024/1024 from v$datafile;

NAME                                                                             BYTES/1024/1024/1024
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------
/oradata/TESTWCTDB/system01.dbf                                                                     0
/oradata/TESTWCTDB/sysaux01.dbf                                                                     0
/oradata/TESTWCTDB/undotbs01.dbf                                                                    0
/oradata/TESTWCTDB/users01.dbf                                                             .004882813
/langchao/dumpdata/FTMSDIP_DATA.dbf                                                                 3
/oradata/ftms_zx_data.dbf                                                                           0
/oradata/ftms_zx_data2.dbf                                                                          0
/oradata/ftms_zx_data3.dbf                                                                          0
/langchao/dumpdata/QIANZHANG_DATA.dbf                                                               5
/oradata/ftms_zx_data4.dbf                                                                          0
/langchao/dumpdata/FTMS_NEWBL_DATA.dbf                                                             30
/oradata/ftms_credit_data.dbf                                                                       0
/langchao/dumpdata/PJDIP_DATA.dbf                                                                  20
/oradata/ftms_credit_data2.dbf                                                                      0
/oradata/ftms_old.dbf                                                                               0
/langchao/dumpdata/FTMS_JD_DATA.dbf                                                                15
/oradata/ftms_credit_data_6.dbf                                                                     0
/oradata/udpcount_01.dbf                                                                            5
/oradata/udpcount_02.dbf                                                                            5
/oradata/rTB_MBFE                                                                              .03125
/oradata/LCBIPECDS_DAT.DBF                                                                         .5
/langchao/dumpdata/FTMS_CS_DATA.dbf                                                                30
/langchao/dumpdata/FTMS_NEWBL2_DATA.dbf                                                            30
/oradata/dump_data/FTMS_CSBF_DATA.dbf                                                               0
/oradata/ftmshtdata.dbf                                                                    .087890625
/oradata/ftms_credit_data5.dbf                                                                      0
/langchao/dumpdata/FTMS_JD_DATA2.dbf                                                                3
/langchao/dumpdata/FTMS_CS_DATA2.dbf                                                       31.9999847
/langchao/dumpdata/FTMS_CS_DATA3.dbf                                                               10
/oradata/ftms_zx_data5.dbf                                                                          0
/langchao/dumpdata/FTMS_CS_DATA4.dbf                                                        12.109375
/oradata/ftms_zx_test01.dbf                                                                19.0527344
/langchao/dumpdata/FTMS_CS_TDE.dbf                                                                  1
/oradata/TESTWCTDB/ftms_cs3_jiamiceshi                                                     .029296875
/oradata/TESTWCTDB/sd.dbf                                                                           0
/oradata/ftms_zx_test_data.dbf                                                             .009765625
/oradata/ftms_zx_test01_data.dbf                                                                    0
/oradata/ftms_zx_test01_data1.dbf                                                                   0
/oradata/ftms_zx_test01_data2.dbf                                                                   0
/oradata/ftms_zx_test01_data3.dbf                                                                   0
/oradata/ftms_zx_test01_data4.dbf                                                                   0
/oradata/ftms_zx_test01_data5.dbf                                                                   0
/oradata/ftms_zx_test01_data6.dbf                                                          12.5976563
/oradata/ftms_zx_test01_data7.dbf                                                          9.08203125
/oradata/ftms_zx_test01_data8.dbf                                                                6.25

45 rows selected.

把数据文件拷贝回来

cp /proc/20611/fd/302   /langchao/orabak/
cp /proc/20611/fd/301   /langchao/orabak/
cp /proc/20611/fd/300   /langchao/orabak/
cp /proc/20611/fd/299   /langchao/orabak/
cp /proc/20611/fd/298   /langchao/orabak/
cp /proc/20611/fd/297   /langchao/orabak/
cp /proc/20611/fd/295   /langchao/orabak/
cp /proc/20611/fd/290   /langchao/orabak/
cp /proc/20611/fd/285   /langchao/orabak/
cp /proc/20611/fd/284   /langchao/orabak/
cp /proc/20611/fd/283   /langchao/orabak/
cp /proc/20611/fd/281   /langchao/orabak/
cp /proc/20611/fd/274   /langchao/orabak/
cp /proc/20611/fd/272   /langchao/orabak/
cp /proc/20611/fd/271   /langchao/orabak/
cp /proc/20611/fd/269   /langchao/orabak/
cp /proc/20611/fd/267   /langchao/orabak/
cp /proc/20611/fd/265   /langchao/orabak/
cp /proc/20611/fd/264   /langchao/orabak/
cp /proc/20611/fd/263   /langchao/orabak/
cp /proc/20611/fd/260   /langchao/orabak/
cp /proc/20611/fd/259   /langchao/orabak/
cp /proc/20611/fd/258   /langchao/orabak/

由于涉及system表空间数据文件被删除,无法在open情况下直接操作,直接关闭数据库,启动到mount状态,重命名数据文件路径,recover数据文件,open库,恢复完成
参考以前类似恢复:
Solaris rm datafile recovery—利用句柄误删除数据文件恢复
如果数据库已经关闭,需要考虑以下类似恢复方式:
dbca删除库和rm删库恢复
 记录一次rm -rf 删除数据文件异常恢复

ssd trim导致fdisk格式化磁盘之后无法恢复

联系：手机/微信(+86 17813235971) QQ(107644445)

标题：ssd trim导致fdisk格式化磁盘之后无法恢复

8个节点的rac,有一个节点有点问题,重装系统的时候,没有选择任何磁盘

结果发现该机器上的所有磁盘都被分区并且加入到centos的vg中了,导致另外7个节点的asm disk的所有磁盘全部异常,磁盘组无法正常mount,在以前正常的rac节点上pvs扫描发现如下结果

对原asm disk(现在被分区加入到vg中的磁盘)进行分析发现所有的ssd磁盘被的以前记录被置空,机械磁盘的数据正常,机械磁盘kfed看到的记录

[root@xxxrac5 oracle]#  kfed read /dev/mapper/hdisk60 aun=2 aus=4096k
kfbh.endian:                          1 ; 0x000: 0x01
kfbh.hard:                          130 ; 0x001: 0x82
kfbh.type:                            3 ; 0x002: KFBTYP_ALLOCTBL
kfbh.datfmt:                          2 ; 0x003: 0x02
kfbh.block.blk:                    2048 ; 0x004: blk=2048
kfbh.block.obj:              2147483682 ; 0x008: disk=34
kfbh.check:                  2349679586 ; 0x00c: 0x8c0d43e2
kfbh.fcn.base:                   998219 ; 0x010: 0x000f3b4b
kfbh.fcn.wrap:                        0 ; 0x014: 0x00000000
kfbh.spare1:                          0 ; 0x018: 0x00000000
kfbh.spare2:                          0 ; 0x01c: 0x00000000
kfdatb.aunum:                    916608 ; 0x000: 0x000dfc80
………………
kfdate[446].free.hi:                  0 ; 0xe1c: S=0 V=0 L=0 ASZM=0x0 S=0
kfdate[447].discriminator:            0 ; 0xe20: 0x00000000
kfdate[447].free.lo.next:             0 ; 0xe20: 0x0000
kfdate[447].free.lo.prev:             0 ; 0xe22: 0x0000
kfdate[447].free.hi:                  0 ; 0xe24: S=0 V=0 L=0 ASZM=0x0 S=0

分析ssd磁盘的记录情况,发现磁盘中记录全部被置空

[root@xxxrac5 oracle]# kfed read /dev/mapper/ssdisk30 aun=2 aus=4096k
kfbh.endian:                          0 ; 0x000: 0x00
kfbh.hard:                            0 ; 0x001: 0x00
kfbh.type:                            0 ; 0x002: KFBTYP_INVALID
kfbh.datfmt:                          0 ; 0x003: 0x00
kfbh.block.blk:                       0 ; 0x004: blk=0
kfbh.block.obj:                       0 ; 0x008: file=0
kfbh.check:                           0 ; 0x00c: 0x00000000
kfbh.fcn.base:                        0 ; 0x010: 0x00000000
kfbh.fcn.wrap:                        0 ; 0x014: 0x00000000
kfbh.spare1:                          0 ; 0x018: 0x00000000
kfbh.spare2:                          0 ; 0x01c: 0x00000000
000800000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000  [................]
  Repeat 255 times
KFED-00322: invalid content encountered during block traversal: [kfbtTraverseBlock][Invalid OSM block type][][0]

[root@xxxrac5 oracle]# kfed read /dev/mapper/ssdisk30 aun=11 aus=4096k
kfbh.endian:                          0 ; 0x000: 0x00
kfbh.hard:                            0 ; 0x001: 0x00
kfbh.type:                            0 ; 0x002: KFBTYP_INVALID
kfbh.datfmt:                          0 ; 0x003: 0x00
kfbh.block.blk:                       0 ; 0x004: blk=0
kfbh.block.obj:                       0 ; 0x008: file=0
kfbh.check:                           0 ; 0x00c: 0x00000000
kfbh.fcn.base:                        0 ; 0x010: 0x00000000
kfbh.fcn.wrap:                        0 ; 0x014: 0x00000000
kfbh.spare1:                          0 ; 0x018: 0x00000000
kfbh.spare2:                          0 ; 0x01c: 0x00000000
002C00000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000  [................]
  Repeat 255 times
KFED-00322: invalid content encountered during block traversal: [kfbtTraverseBlock][Invalid OSM block type][][0]

[root@xxxrac5 oracle]# kfed read /dev/mapper/ssdisk30 aun=100
kfbh.endian:                          0 ; 0x000: 0x00
kfbh.hard:                            0 ; 0x001: 0x00
kfbh.type:                            0 ; 0x002: KFBTYP_INVALID
kfbh.datfmt:                          0 ; 0x003: 0x00
kfbh.block.blk:                       0 ; 0x004: blk=0
kfbh.block.obj:                       0 ; 0x008: file=0
kfbh.check:                           0 ; 0x00c: 0x00000000
kfbh.fcn.base:                        0 ; 0x010: 0x00000000
kfbh.fcn.wrap:                        0 ; 0x014: 0x00000000
kfbh.spare1:                          0 ; 0x018: 0x00000000
kfbh.spare2:                          0 ; 0x01c: 0x00000000
006400000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000  [................]
  Repeat 255 times
KFED-00322: invalid content encountered during block traversal: [kfbtTraverseBlock][Invalid OSM block type][][0]

[root@xxxrac5 oracle]# kfed read /dev/mapper/ssdisk30 aun=1000
kfbh.endian:                          0 ; 0x000: 0x00
kfbh.hard:                            0 ; 0x001: 0x00
kfbh.type:                            0 ; 0x002: KFBTYP_INVALID
kfbh.datfmt:                          0 ; 0x003: 0x00
kfbh.block.blk:                       0 ; 0x004: blk=0
kfbh.block.obj:                       0 ; 0x008: file=0
kfbh.check:                           0 ; 0x00c: 0x00000000
kfbh.fcn.base:                        0 ; 0x010: 0x00000000
kfbh.fcn.wrap:                        0 ; 0x014: 0x00000000
kfbh.spare1:                          0 ; 0x018: 0x00000000
kfbh.spare2:                          0 ; 0x01c: 0x00000000
03E800000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000  [................]
  Repeat 255 times
KFED-00322: invalid content encountered during block traversal: [kfbtTraverseBlock][Invalid OSM block type][][0]

[root@xxxrac5 oracle]# kfed read /dev/mapper/ssdisk30 aun=10000
kfbh.endian:                          0 ; 0x000: 0x00
kfbh.hard:                            0 ; 0x001: 0x00
kfbh.type:                            0 ; 0x002: KFBTYP_INVALID
kfbh.datfmt:                          0 ; 0x003: 0x00
kfbh.block.blk:                       0 ; 0x004: blk=0
kfbh.block.obj:                       0 ; 0x008: file=0
kfbh.check:                           0 ; 0x00c: 0x00000000
kfbh.fcn.base:                        0 ; 0x010: 0x00000000
kfbh.fcn.wrap:                        0 ; 0x014: 0x00000000
kfbh.spare1:                          0 ; 0x018: 0x00000000
kfbh.spare2:                          0 ; 0x01c: 0x00000000
271000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000  [................]
  Repeat 255 times
KFED-00322: invalid content encountered during block traversal: [kfbtTraverseBlock][Invalid OSM block type][][0]

[root@xxxrac5 oracle]# kfed read /dev/mapper/ssdisk30 aun=100000
kfbh.endian:                          0 ; 0x000: 0x00
kfbh.hard:                            0 ; 0x001: 0x00
kfbh.type:                            0 ; 0x002: KFBTYP_INVALID
kfbh.datfmt:                          0 ; 0x003: 0x00
kfbh.block.blk:                       0 ; 0x004: blk=0
kfbh.block.obj:                       0 ; 0x008: file=0
kfbh.check:                           0 ; 0x00c: 0x00000000
kfbh.fcn.base:                        0 ; 0x010: 0x00000000
kfbh.fcn.wrap:                        0 ; 0x014: 0x00000000
kfbh.spare1:                          0 ; 0x018: 0x00000000
kfbh.spare2:                          0 ; 0x01c: 0x00000000
186A000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000  [................]
  Repeat 255 times
KFED-00322: invalid content encountered during block traversal: [kfbtTraverseBlock][Invalid OSM block type][][0]

[root@xxxrac5 oracle]# kfed read /dev/mapper/ssdisk30 aun=100000
kfbh.endian:                          0 ; 0x000: 0x00
kfbh.hard:                            0 ; 0x001: 0x00
kfbh.type:                            0 ; 0x002: KFBTYP_INVALID
kfbh.datfmt:                          0 ; 0x003: 0x00
kfbh.block.blk:                       0 ; 0x004: blk=0
kfbh.block.obj:                       0 ; 0x008: file=0
kfbh.check:                           0 ; 0x00c: 0x00000000
kfbh.fcn.base:                        0 ; 0x010: 0x00000000
kfbh.fcn.wrap:                        0 ; 0x014: 0x00000000
kfbh.spare1:                          0 ; 0x018: 0x00000000
kfbh.spare2:                          0 ; 0x01c: 0x00000000
186A000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000  [................]
  Repeat 255 times
KFED-00322: invalid content encountered during block traversal: [kfbtTraverseBlock][Invalid OSM block type][][0]

dd ssd磁盘100M数据压缩前后大小比较(压缩之后只有150kb左右,除了分区和lv信息之外其他全部是0)

通过linux命令查看磁盘是否是为ssd（cat /sys/block/sdfr/queue/rotational为1表示机械磁盘,0表示ssd磁盘）

hdisk66 (360060e8007c550000030c55000000223) dm-66 HITACHI ,OPEN-V          
size=2.0T features='0' hwhandler='0' wp=rw
`-+- policy='service-time 0' prio=1 status=active
  |- 10:0:1:4  sdfr               130:208 active ready running
  |- 7:0:0:4   sds                65:32   active ready running
  |- 8:0:1:4   sdu                65:64   active ready running
  `- 9:0:1:4   sdx                65:112  active ready running
ssdisk58 (26e8d69b6480c854f6c9ce90091cfe58e) dm-22 Nimble  ,Server          
size=2.0T features='1 queue_if_no_path' hwhandler='1 alua' wp=rw
|-+- policy='round-robin 0' prio=50 status=active
| `- 7:0:1:48  sdfu               131:0   active ready running
`-+- policy='round-robin 0' prio=1 status=enabled
  `- 10:0:0:48 sdek               128:192 active ghost running
ssdisk43 (2e0e493e08cfd75996c9ce90091cfe58e) dm-8 Nimble  ,Server          
size=2.0T features='1 queue_if_no_path' hwhandler='1 alua' wp=rw
|-+- policy='round-robin 0' prio=50 status=active
| `- 7:0:1:35  sdev               129:112 active ready running
`-+- policy='round-robin 0' prio=1 status=enabled
  `- 10:0:0:35 sddj               71:16   active ghost running
ssdisk60 (2696bc3246f81fb116c9ce90091cfe58e) dm-34 Nimble  ,Server          
size=2.0T features='1 queue_if_no_path' hwhandler='1 alua' wp=rw
|-+- policy='round-robin 0' prio=50 status=active
| `- 7:0:1:59  sdgq               132:96  active ready running
`-+- policy='round-robin 0' prio=1 status=enabled
  `- 10:0:0:59 sdfg               130:32  active ghost running
ssdisk08 (2629f870548db01a76c9ce90091cfe58e) dm-35 Nimble  ,Server          
size=2.0T features='1 queue_if_no_path' hwhandler='1 alua' wp=rw
|-+- policy='round-robin 0' prio=50 status=active
| `- 7:0:1:6   sdcq               69:224  active ready running
`-+- policy='round-robin 0' prio=1 status=enabled
  `- 10:0:0:6  sdz                65:144  active ghost running
[root@odsrac5 oracle]# cat /sys/block/sdcq/queue/rotational
0
[root@odsrac5 oracle]# cat /sys/block/sdcu/queue/rotational
0
[root@odsrac5 oracle]# cat /sys/block/sdfr/queue/rotational
1

出现该问题是由于ssd盘的trim操作导致,相关知识补充:TRIM(SATA), Deallocate(NVMe), UNMAP(SCSI)指的是同一类指令，都是为了减少不必要的数据搬移。
原因：
在文件系统中，删除文件并没有真正的删除物理的数据，只是清空了记录表。而此时，对SSD来说，它并不知道文件已经被删除了，只有下次覆写的时候，SSD才能发现之前被删除的文件对应的page是无效的，从而启动GC。然而，如果在此之前发生了GC等数据搬移动作，无效的page仍然会被当做是有效的。重新磁盘分区,重建文件系统也可能触发类似操作
作用：
Trim 只是一个指令，它让操作系统通知 SSD 主控某个页的数据已经‘无效’后，任务就已完成，并没有更多的操作。TRIM 的先进性在于它可以让固态硬盘在进行垃圾回收的时候跳过移动无用数据的过程，从而不再用重新写入这些无用的数据，达到节省时间的目的。

redhat和oracle linux kernel对应关系—202310

联系：手机/微信(+86 17813235971) QQ(107644445)

标题：redhat和oracle linux kernel对应关系—202310

补充说明：

Oracle Linux RHCK kernels correspond to Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Edition kernels only
From Oracle Linux 4.8, 5.3, 6.0, 7.0, 8.0, 9.0 onward, /etc/redhat-release file content mirrors that of corresponding RHEL 4/5/6/7/8/9 versions
From Oracle Linux 5.6 onward, UEK is the default boot kernel
* default boot kernel
^ default installed kernel
# available only via ULN / Oracle YUM Server update
UEKR7 (5.15.0) available from Oracle Linux 8.7 (x86_64, aarch64), 9.0 (x86_64, aarch64)
UEKR6 (5.4.17) available from Oracle Linux 7.9 (x86_64, aarch64), 8.2 (x86_64, aarch64)
UEKR5 (4.1.14) available from Oracle Linux 7.5 (aarch64), 7.6 (x86_64), 8.1 (x86_64)
UEKR4 (4.1.12) available from Oracle Linux 6.8 (x86, x86_64), 7.3 (x86_64)
UEKR3 (3.8.13) available from Oracle Linux 6.4 (x86, x86_64), 7.0 (x86_64)
UEKR2 (2.6.39) available from Oracle Linux 5.9 (x86, x86_64), 6.3 (x86, x86_64)
UEK[R1] (2.6.32) available from Oracle Linux 5.5 (x86, x86_64), 6.0 (x86, x86_64)

参考：Oracle Linux: Comparison of Oracle Linux and Red Hat Enterprise Linux Kernel Versions (Doc ID 560992.1)

ARM上的oracle数据库存储字节序分析—小字节序

联系：手机/微信(+86 17813235971) QQ(107644445)

标题：ARM上的oracle数据库存储字节序分析—小字节序

对在ARM CPU上运行的oracle数据库进行分析,判断大小字节序问题
从系统上lscpu看是小字节序

[root@xifenfei ~]# lscpu
Architecture:                    aarch64
CPU op-mode(s):                  32-bit, 64-bit
Byte Order:                      Little Endian
CPU(s):                          8
On-line CPU(s) list:             0-7
Thread(s) per core:              1
Core(s) per socket:              8
Socket(s):                       1
NUMA node(s):                    1
Vendor ID:                       ARM
Model:                           1
Model name:                      Cortex-A76
Stepping:                        r4p1
BogoMIPS:                        125.00
NUMA node0 CPU(s):               0-7
…………
[root@xifenfei ~]#

从dbid分析字节序问题
数据库中查看dbid值

SQL> select name,dbid,PLATFORM_ID,PLATFORM_NAME from v$database;

NAME            DBID PLATFORM_ID
--------- ---------- -----------
PLATFORM_NAME
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ARMDB     1195886419          23
Linux OS (AARCH64)

bbed查看dbid值

BBED> p kcvfh.kcvfhhdr.kccfhdbi
ub4 kccfhdbi                                @28       0x4747c753

BBED> set count 16
        COUNT           16

BBED> d
 File: /tmp/system01.dbf (0)
 Block: 1                Offsets:   28 to   43           Dba:0x00000000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
 53c74747 41524d44 42000000 03040000 

 <32 bytes per line>

从这里可以看出来dbid(1195886419)是倒序存储的,也就证明了arm linux上面运行的oracle 是小字节序的.

gpk-update-icon进程占用CPU资源100％

联系：手机/微信(+86 17813235971) QQ(107644445)

标题：gpk-update-icon进程占用CPU资源100％

在一个客户的机器上发现gpk-update-icon进程长期占用cpu 100%

gpk-update-icon进程在GUI模式下会自动通知rpm软件包更新，是由gnome-packagekit的bug造成的。
gpk-update-icon使用递归主循环，递归循环从dbus回调调用。因此，它处于调度操作的中间，并且在操作完成之前dbus无法进一步调度。
临时解决方法

killall gpk-update-icon

掉掉相关进程之后临时恢复正常,如果要防止后续再发生该问题,可以把系统启动到非图形化界面

[root@HIS_DG ~]# cat /etc/redhat-release 
Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.8 (Santiago)
[root@HIS_DG ~]# runlevel
N 5
[root@HIS_DG ~]# who -r
         run-level 5  2021-11-13 12:04
[root@HIS_DG ~]# init 3
[root@HIS_DG ~]# who -r
         run-level 3  2023-05-17 14:12                   last=5
[root@HIS_DG ~]# runlevel
5 3

或者卸载相关包

#yum remove gnome-packagekit 或 rpm -e gpk-update-icon

udev_start导致vip漂移(参见情况:rac在线加盘操作引起)

联系：手机/微信(+86 17813235971) QQ(107644445)

标题：udev_start导致vip漂移(参见情况:rac在线加盘操作引起)

客户对asm进行扩容,执行udev_start命令之后,所有的vip全部漂移,业务全部中断

优先恢复业务,把所有vip漂移回来

[grid@rac3 ~]$  srvctl relocate vip -i rac1 -n rac1 -f -v
VIP was relocated successfully.
[grid@rac3 ~]$  srvctl relocate vip -i rac2 -n rac2 -f -v
VIP was relocated successfully.
[grid@rac3 ~]$  srvctl relocate vip -i rac3 -n rac3 -f -v
VIP was relocated successfully.
[grid@rac3 ~]$  srvctl relocate vip -i rac4 -n rac4 -f -v
VIP was relocated successfully.

vip恢复正常，业务也恢复正常

出现该问题的原因是由于udev_start命令引起网卡瞬间中断,从而使得vip发生漂移

查看ifcfg配置文件

引起该问题的原因是udev对网卡进行了操作,从而引起该问题,处理建议在对应的ifcfg文件中加上 HOTPLUG=”no” （pulbic,private和其他需要关注的网络）
参考:Network interface going down when dynamically adding disks to storage using udev in RHEL 6 (Doc ID 1569028.1)

分类目录归档：Linux